[dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 12 June 2012 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAD621F86EA; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PosNKFhOusyf; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F7821F85A1; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.20
Message-ID: <20120612191008.895.6966.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:10:08 -0700
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:10:09 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the DNS Extensions Working Group of the IETF. Title : Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status Author(s) : Scott Rose Filename : draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03.txt Pages : 6 Date : 2012-06-12 Abstract: The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) requires the use of cryptographic algorithm suites for generating digital signatures over DNS data. There is currently an IANA registry for these algorithms that lacks the recommended implementation status of each algorithm. This document provides an applicability statement on algorithm implementation status for DNSSEC component software. This document lists each algorithm's status based on the current reference. In the case that an algorithm is specified without an implementation status, this document assigns one. This document updates RFCs 2536, 2539, 3110, 4034, 4398, 5155, 5702, and 5933. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/submission.filename }}-03 A diff from previous version is available at: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-imp-status-03 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg… internet-drafts
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Scott Rose
- Re: [dnsext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec… Steve Crocker