Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better

Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de> Tue, 18 January 2011 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <fweimer@bfk.de>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD803A6FDA for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:41:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.125
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.125 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxxrkuEGo1Y0 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:41:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx01.bfk.de (mx01.bfk.de [193.227.124.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B329B3A6FE2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx00.int.bfk.de ([10.119.110.2]) by mx01.bfk.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1Pf92k-0006zW-HV; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:44:06 +0000
Received: by bfk.de with local id 1Pf92k-0005Fn-9P; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:44:06 +0000
To: Krishna Birth <krishnabirth@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikv9muqBKbm0WpvtkyFb5DT9==P_6ySAow7u0b7@mail.gmail.com>
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:44:06 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikv9muqBKbm0WpvtkyFb5DT9==P_6ySAow7u0b7@mail.gmail.com> (Krishna Birth's message of "Fri\, 14 Jan 2011 21\:48\:10 +0000")
Message-ID: <82ei8afq4p.fsf@mid.bfk.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Increasing character limit for registration in internet domain names: 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64 higher the better
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:41:34 -0000

* Krishna Birth:

> This is a request for internet engineers to increase the character limit for
> registration in the various internet domain names (com, net, org, info etc)
> from 63 characters to more at least 76 or 68 or 91 or 83 or 64, the higher
> it is the better.  I believe the raising the characters on the internet
> domain names will [be] very good from a spiritual perspective.  I base these
> figures on the spiritual prayer and chant:

Something similar has already been tried: extended label types, as
described in RFCs 2671 and 2673.

I wasn't really around when the failure of this experiment was
recognized.  Is there a write-up somewhere explaining why this doesn't
work as expected?  (Without major protocol surgery, increasing the
label length would share a similar fate.)

-- 
Florian Weimer                <fweimer@bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH       http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100              tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe             fax: +49-721-96201-99