Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration
Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Wed, 04 January 2012 07:48 UTC
Return-Path: <miekg@atoom.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F4E21F860D for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:48:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.604, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uj7JXkk7dlh8 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:48:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elektron.atoom.net (cl-201.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:c8::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F089921F85CC for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 23:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0E353FF2F; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 08:48:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:48:08 +0100
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120104074808.GA27592@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: dnsext@ietf.org
References: <20120102104613.GB12764@miek.nl> <4F0373E5.1000207@ogud.com> <20120103220324.GA395@vacation.karoshi.com.>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120103220324.GA395@vacation.karoshi.com.>
User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux
X-Home: http://www.miek.nl
Subject: Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 07:48:17 -0000
[ Quoting <bmanning@vacation.karoshi> at 22:03 on Jan 3 in "Re: [dnsext] SIG inc..." ] > > my first DNSSEC code written in fall 1994 (signer) did not inter operate > > with later code (resolver spring 1995) and the reason was the order > > change and I always coded from current drafts. > > gahhh... should I pull out my code fm that era? Why not? I'm curious. Regards, Miek
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Mark Andrews
- [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Miek Gieben
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] SIG inception/expiration John Dickinson