Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Mon, 05 December 2011 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8624F21F8C21 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:41:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QPBlzRzJZ-pd for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:41:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60A821F8C22 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 08:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from work-laptop-2 (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB5Gf3gK012575; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:41:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.200.139] by work-laptop-2 (PGP Universal service); Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:41:03 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by work-laptop-2 on Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:41:03 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240800cb02a33fd744@[192.168.1.102]>
In-Reply-To: <20111205123652.GE84440@shinkuro.com>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <002301ccb1bc$d6c84980$ca01a8c0@computer> <7E643BE4-8E59-4C1A-B8EC-7EC430DD2A51@vpnc.org> <a06240801cb001060e91a@[192.168.128.223]> <20111205123652.GE84440@shinkuro.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:40:29 -0500
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:41:07 -0000

Ralph,

I think Andrew answered the question here.  When I wrote my message 
in the back of my mind was the same issue, I just couldn't firm it 
up.  I ran into this when I tried to get "The Undocumented Types" 
document going.

At 18:48 -0500 12/3/11, Ralph Droms wrote:
>Ed: Can you say more about your last question?
>
>    Are all instructions to IANA complete and understood?

At 7:36 -0500 12/5/11, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>Hat back on.  No.  One of the major problems we in fact have has to do
>with RRTYPE code point assignment, which is (from IANA's point of
>view) broken, and which also does not happen according to the
>published process.  I believe that needs to be fixed.

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg11774.html is 
a comment that reflects that all is not well.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Vote for the word of the day:
"Papa"razzi - father that constantly takes photos of the baby
Corpureaucracy - The institution of corporate "red tape"