[dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-04
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Mon, 09 May 2011 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD39E06CF for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 14:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.783
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.783 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.184, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TwTk1-KcBrdi for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2011 14:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFB1E06BE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2011 14:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywi6 with SMTP id 6so2469131ywi.31 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dpA+HTlbWJdey/A3H72hJSNE4OYkwvjJy/OkvX8rK78=; b=DHlt+RupVqJvrhgVKYPMCy1GRRnGC9zEtEL2hvMNH1dk1IhedkvumLMGotAD6pvUnG O+zir5I3FSTKnu24sCQU/CIq/DHhd9G56uU3I20v8VzChiqB8iicBxrai95XTTguguB9 /i8OihUGMKMGi0pj4TJLIXif6c0GbfVV+3hl4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=a+EHVawWUZ600Wl8dIBJK+sE3rN/i+vTIBJNhVuSap8wx8la4bA8c3wrmZogDC7/3i MbSHSWlG5kJk4WiXJX2/ZntkNvfQa/4f82JZOfGigwWB46EuNfRUA50KwjrEMvm7zcle pdDeuec9+B0fAZmMHZGoZ7foYgtr+3mlufsN4=
Received: by 10.151.21.5 with SMTP id y5mr5847229ybi.304.1304978161204; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.42.16 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 14:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110509215148.F0F45E072C@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20110509215148.F0F45E072C@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 06:55:41 +0900
Message-ID: <BANLkTim7MCweDC+y6iJRF6a-its7U-YDJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DNSEXT WG <dnsext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-04
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 21:56:03 -0000
I have updated dates, version number, author info, and boilerplate. And I've unambiguously removed "unambiguously"... Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org> Date: Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:51 AM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-04 To: d3e3e3@gmail.com A new version of I-D, draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Donald Eastlake 3rd and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-eastlake-dnsext-xnamercode Revision: 04 Title: xNAME RCODE and Status Bits Clarification Creation_date: 2011-05-09 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 9 Abstract: The Domain Name System (DNS) has long provided means, such as CNAME (Canonical Name), where a query can be redirected to a different name. A DNS response header has an RCODE (Response Code) field, used for indicating errors, and response status bits. This document clarifies, in the case of such redirected queries, how the RCODE and status bits correspond to the initial query cycle (where the CNAME or the like was detected) and subsequent or final query cycles. The IETF Secretariat.
- [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-… Donald Eastlake