IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Fwd: djb on NXDOMAIN/NODATA for non-terminals

Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Tue, 29 March 2011 16:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47103A6975 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ry1pLZqVG5la for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4EA3A695D for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Work-Laptop-2.local (gatt.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.6]) by stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2TGR2Nc065868; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:27:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.200.119] by Work-Laptop-2.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:27:08 -0400
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Work-Laptop-2.local on Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:27:08 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240807c9b7b5a6e892@[10.31.200.119]>
In-Reply-To: <95465.1301414968@nsa.vix.com>
References: <AANLkTimCZVyag8+Pv8zJsah2B-C=h3bPJ=DNVVo3agLc@mail.gmail.com> <34319.1301351478@nsa.vix.com> <BANLkTikkx4ndK3TpByptuRdtPGuFztm2yA@mail.gmail.com> <65033.1301383238@nsa.vix.com> <82ei5qz3bi.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <84978.1301403827@nsa.vix.com> <82fwq6vsvk.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <94669.1301414190@nsa.vix.com> <a06240806c9b7b2040e80@[10.31.200.119]> <95465.1301414968@nsa.vix.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:18:52 -0400
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Fwd: djb on NXDOMAIN/NODATA for non-terminals
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:25:32 -0000

At 16:09 +0000 3/29/11, Paul Vixie wrote:
>>  Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:58:29 -0400
>>  From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
>>
>>  >is there any opposition to this change?
>>
>>  Given the back and forth, can you summarize what "this change" refers to?
>
>this one:
>
>>  > > this sounds like a veiled suggestion that we remove this from resimprove

"remove this" -> remove what?  Trying to find the messages on this, 
it seems there was some mention of an EDNS option, but in

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vixie-dnsext-resimprove-00

I don't see any mention of EDNS.

>>  > I strongly believe that this would improve the quality of the document
>>  > (in terms of reflecting existing practice), so yes. 8-)
>
>referring to $subject which is "NXDOMAIN/NODATA for non-terminals".


-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar                    You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468

Me to infant son: "Waah! Waah! Is that all you can say?  Waah?"
Son: "Waah!"

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status