IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 05 December 2011 03:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FAF11E8090 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:35:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qsyekKUA5Jiu for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C4C911E8073 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 19:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shinkuro.com (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08E7D1ECB41C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 03:34:54 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:35:09 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20111205033509.GC84440@shinkuro.com>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <EEAE3014-48B5-4344-B253-7A2269447EA5@cisco.com> <20111204055236.GB19382@vacation.karoshi.com.> <A48F2510-A84D-461B-AA9C-8BA29B8503F0@rfc1035.com> <20111204232556.GA30268@vacation.karoshi.com.> <7A0435E4-C0D0-4D0B-A6C0-B2704B8AFFC3@rfc1035.com> <20111205023930.GA30651@vacation.karoshi.com.>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111205023930.GA30651@vacation.karoshi.com.>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 03:35:12 -0000

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:39:30AM +0000, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

> 	actually, it kind of does - the directorate came into existance to 
> 	support dnsext

As far as I understand the purpose of directorates, they are designed
to provide support for ADs, and not for WGs.  My understanding of the
DNS Directorate and its structure conforms to that.

The Directorate's composition will, I suppose, perhaps need
adjustment, because two of its members (Olafur and me) will disappear:
our roles are ex-officio, and in the event there's no office, there's
no office to be out of.

In any case,

> 	as long as they are tied together - then they will get mentioned 
> 	together.

they are plainly not tied together.  For instance, the DNS Directorate
also serves the OPS ADs, and the chairs of DNSOP are ex-officio
members too.

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status