IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp

"Ralf Weber" <dns@fl1ger.de> Mon, 21 January 2019 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199BF129508 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 02:42:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9q-VHxF9UJ7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 02:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.guxx.net (smtp.guxx.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:322c::25:42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9171228B7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 02:42:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix, from userid 107) id 816045F422D7; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:41:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.19.153.9] (p4FF53CB0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.245.60.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nyx.guxx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE4445F400AA; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:41:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
To: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org>
Cc: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:41:57 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.3r5579)
Message-ID: <628F00A6-075F-40F1-A3D7-0C93BD88268F@fl1ger.de>
In-Reply-To: <52CC68F4-231A-4002-A615-12F2F044342E@isc.org>
References: <BCACF554-8BE6-49BC-B75A-BCED776F5189@NLnetLabs.nl> <4A75C4E3-F74F-46DB-9A8A-879C0BB79190@powerdns.com> <52CC68F4-231A-4002-A615-12F2F044342E@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-1ksGgjNEjYJvVkHJABEEvRadjE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:42:03 -0000

Moin!

On 21 Jan 2019, at 11:26, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> On 21 Jan 2019, at 11:22, Peter van Dijk 
>> <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> wrote:
>> Please do not adopt.
>
> +1 to everything that Peter said.  I’ve been opposing ATR draft from 
> the very beginning.  We can’t be removing EDNS workarounds and at 
> the same time slap another workaround into the DNS.
Another +1 for not adopting this draft. I wonder if there is a 
coincidence that the end of the adoption call is on the same date as DNS 
Flag day ;-).

If I recall the presentation that lead to this correct it is mostly an 
IPv6 problem and given the nature of DNS it will only occur if all name 
servers are on v6. Having one v6 name server that will respond correct 
with fragments also solves the problem. I think the problem space is to 
narrow to burden this problem on all resolvers.

So long
-Ralf
—--
Ralf Weber

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email