IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] zonemd/xhash versus nothing new

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 01 August 2018 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19FA130E26 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 04:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gc4mV-8jI8W9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 04:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EE66130E1C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 04:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:56080) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1fkpJw-000hVy-MD (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:29:36 +0100
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 12:29:36 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <45f16f82-4a06-b194-a6e5-da0a230527c0@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808011228080.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807271758580.22024@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807301424400.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <a6226b2d-957a-7953-3a17-67a7282984bb@nic.cz> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807311549150.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <45f16f82-4a06-b194-a6e5-da0a230527c0@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-703925722-1533122976=:3596"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-2F8XqsS_uTlhOh39OhlAvqMVPw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] zonemd/xhash versus nothing new
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 11:29:40 -0000

Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> wrote:
>
> One problem I can see is that these additional RRSIGs effectively
> prevent modification of data but not removal of glue (or NS in out-out
> intervals) ...

I was kind of assuming that the NSEC chain would include the glue -
obviously delegations and glue in opt-out intervals are not protected at
all.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne, Dogger: South or southwest 4 or 5,
occasionally 6 at first in Cromarty and Forth, then becoming variable 3 at
times. Slight throughout in Tyne and Dogger, but elsewhere slight or moderate.
Fair then rain at times. Good, occasionally moderate.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email