Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 03 November 2015 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2DA1AD0C0; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:37:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q-SIlJwLp3dG; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 390ED1AD0BA; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:37:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A0033493CF; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 05:37:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F06F916004F; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 05:37:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA02160069; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 05:37:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 4uYVyUNLO-tE; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 05:37:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c122-106-161-187.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.161.187]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90C2216004F; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 05:37:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AF43BBB46A; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:37:11 +1100 (EST)
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20151102074846.14431.30976.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D25D44C3.1913B8%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com> <D25E5E26.1916A1%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com> <20151103052757.DAF2D3BBB299@rock.dv.isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:27:57 +1100." <20151103052757.DAF2D3BBB299@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 16:37:11 +1100
Message-Id: <20151103053711.A9AF43BBB46A@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-3TSKn7LegIH18Eb-4IYc9BJXoY>
Cc: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>, "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>, "terry.manderson@icann.org" <terry.manderson@icann.org>, "Ebersman, Paul" <Paul_Ebersman@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-jjmb-sunset4-dns-forwarding-ipv4aas-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 05:37:24 -0000

Also perhaps we should be looking at RFC3901bis.  Alain, Johan are you
interested?

Mark

In message <20151103052757.DAF2D3BBB299@rock.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews writes:
> 
> The simplest way to force this is for the ISP to only supply IPv6
> recursive recursive servers to the CPE where 464XLAT / MAP* / DS-Lite
> is in use.  Also if a DUID is presented over DHCPv4 (RFC 4361) don't
> return nameservers.  The CPE device should be getting nameservers
> via RA/DHCPv6 in this case.
> 
> The CPE at this point can only advertise it's own addresses IPv4
> address or manually configured addresses.
> 
> Iterative servers should prefer IPv6.
> 
> Mark
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org