Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 30 September 2016 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7CE12B03D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.607
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TG_Qwp5usPGP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B6CD12B030 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id y6so95063921lff.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=661aOSWuA9uoncaCGB2RPBkPbCVFwxk8o2ZTKXqyxlM=; b=tCxoy5nyA0ZEwJEayicueDSOXpIA4ONqFgA6GVNRhIQhVZAl9KmnnLsu8h8Cw+xoRk hP7FN6L/uBKuLArevPK/srEQRvhD6IkjQ6N77mIuwLnbTqgIMwMnb5kQ7lnx5tzBugXr fKzTeC0TvURniyDHz+Rxco9uLpG7DVWcY5wPtXvWW3DZc/ivJPWTbaAXohpqJSqhv2Pd fRAEX4FZKkLIoXIV57EukUF5HcB7ouuWRFLyeiMJj5WekWdlpplPY9TOO/6sCawKutI2 4YHtLd6e796Z1BUPCoZ/VZFyWpBYX9UAhQYEzSRPRJovfD2Qj80QwPIx42RE3xB+ccuH FBTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=661aOSWuA9uoncaCGB2RPBkPbCVFwxk8o2ZTKXqyxlM=; b=MfJKqLMLzrg5yNuRj3QZvR82k2fcnpqqJMKh7693o+3183+cDzu5WmshCtmZAma1gU swbo5qoPXl0gDwOIbLQPDEqbOB1ytnwfoADcx15UqvOt5x7ToDEF8h0wFP5EqUqof2df 769NluEf87Nz7V8HqcMiDsPUwqwviXctd7RfQfoh+QQmEIhTuqs6d6yYPCd2pWGaHaul 9O0yFQHDVleEXkNOCIWTUUxXceBrWM4f8DyMhsifkbyNFoxGYzVPERpYSi8nIx+nGXxX FtTscyfjDpszfeguyB0oHTQk1eGH96KSGkGK9Po9UzKqdr+BxBRYUKuxBgEeCxHNpXrZ HXIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmVT1zYwiEoGJbLFq38YcI1/gs0G56VGp7iLGbB2rY3rTDEKNVu8HP7Ahcbx+fpVnq3XxF8KUisJ8KYYA==
X-Received: by 10.25.234.213 with SMTP id y82mr1496646lfi.78.1475206071678; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 20:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609292309340.87490@ary.qy>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609292041280.86752@ary.qy> <CAKr6gn04Jj5ar2OhztH2uc4WpFZBZ=WKZdx-1ufdFMb9NAQupQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=zDBcbaPVi50dFJXVVSrsBuUrb52iBu4T76Y_zYuxFkQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=5kAb20mGLJPmmuQCL6ta9aJn3uEdVv=gVgG9erQoKkw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1km66hoc7VFPvaHi4Sc0WuQxZFtQUPjLjK_Sj6qAtZ5UQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1keNUiDAUuVn97XLb3W6oH7zdZhMeNbg3h-O892+acPVQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609292309340.87490@ary.qy>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 23:27:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mDC38Oq2mzMkx4ZxSkz2erfCHafz9iTmso-wG_33f8cA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-6DpOShXkSL3aBdwi3Fbco6ShxI>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 03:27:56 -0000

Okay, John, if you can state the problem in one sentence and not have
it just be your particular view of the problem, let's hear that
sentence.   Otherwise, can you stop with the hyperbole?

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:10 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>> So, if anyone is still wondering why we need a /good/ problem statement,
>> this discussion is why.  You are both taking past reach other because you
>> are looking at only the part of the problem you care about.
>
>
> Agreed.  It's also why the problem statement has to be as short as possible,
> like one sentence, so people can't read it multiple ways.
>
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly