Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 03 July 2017 22:10 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB1E131677; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:10:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2UeU0jvAOnfw; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC5E913162A; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v63MAGBG042116 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:10:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC6FA325-2155-4F0E-BE3B-F685560CAC80@fugue.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:10:16 -0500
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, suzworldwide@gmail.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F668DA01-A3FE-4C4C-B60F-6FF7E6124519@nostrum.com>
References: <149911945436.16104.4945055646551352620.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BC6FA325-2155-4F0E-BE3B-F685560CAC80@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-9luac4hVf9erL21btwd9_VVk94>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 22:10:27 -0000
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote: >> Is there something to be gained by going out on the "believed to be complete" limb? > > The idea was to dare people to contradict the statement. Seems to have worked... :) > Okay. It seemed like tempting fate, but if that was the intent… :-)