Re: [DNSOP] AD review: draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

[Ralph Droms <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the review and helpful comments, Benoit.

Ted, Warren - I'm login to be tied up with some family stuff through the weekend.  If none of us get to it, I can process Benoit's comments Monday.

- Ralph

> On May 30, 2017, at 11:22 AM, Benoit Claise <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Dear authors,
> 
> Here is my AD review.
> 
> 
> - 
>    This section presents a list of problems that have been identified
>    with respect to the assignment of Special-Use Domain Names.
>    Solutions to these problems, including their costs or tradeoffs, are
>    out of scope for this document. 
> 
>    There is a broad diversity of opinion about this set of problems.
>    Not every participant agrees that each of the problems enumerated in
>    this document is actually a problem.  This document takes no position
>    on the relative validity of the various problems that have been
>    enumerated.  Its focused purposes are to enumerate those problems,
>    provide the reader with context for thinking about them and provide a
>    context for future discussion of solutions.
> 
> So you want to write something such as  ... regardless of whether the problems are valid ones AND regardless of the ownership (IETF, IANA, ICANN, or ...) 
> And it seems that you didn't try to categorize the problems per ownership (this is an IETF or ICANN problem, as an example).
> I guess that this is the way you approached this document, right? You should document this.
> 
> - 
> gTLD Generic Top-Level Domain, as defined in in section 2 of RFC
> 7719 [RFC7719]
> 
> gTLD is not strictly defined in RFC7719, only TLD
> 
> - correct the .home section in 4.2.7, which is solved with Errata ID: 4677 
> 
> 
> MINOR
> - 
>    [SDO-ICANN-DAG]
>               Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, "Special-Use Domain
>               Names registry", October 2015,
>               <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook- <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook-full-04jun12-en.pdf>
>               full-04jun12-en.pdf <https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/guidebook-full-04jun12-en.pdf>>
> 
> Don't you have a more up to date reference (2012)?
> First page of this document is: "Currently the namespace consists of 22 gTLDs and over 250 ccTLDs operating on various models."
> -
>    o  There are several Domain Name TLDs that are in use without due
>       process for a variety of purposes [SDO-ICANN-COLL <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04#ref-SDO-ICANN-COLL>].  The status of
>       these names need to be clarified and recorded to avoid future
>       disputes about their use.
> 
> I don't understand the sentence "There are several Domain Name TLDs that are in use without due
>       process for a variety of purposes", with a reference that speaks about "Name Collision in the DNS".
> 
> 
> EDITORIAL:
> - "in in". Two occurences in
> TLD Top-Level Domain, as defined in in section 2 of RFC 7719
> [RFC7719]
> gTLD Generic Top-Level Domain, as defined in in section 2 of RFC
> 7719 [RFC7719]
> 
> - OLD:
>    Special-Use Domain Name  A Domain Name listed in the Special-Use
>       Domain Names registry.
> NEW:
>    Special-Use Domain Name  A Domain Name listed in the Special-Use
>       Domain Names registry [SDO-IANA-SUDR].
> 
> - OLD:
>    The history of RFC 6762 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762> is documented in substantial detail in
>    Appendix H <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04#appendix-H>
> 
> NEW: 
>    The history of RFC 6762 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6762> is documented in substantial detail in
>    Appendix H of RFC 6762 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-04#appendix-H>
> 
> - Expand SSAC on the first occurrence.
>  
> Regards, Benoit
>