Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt

Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <olafur@cloudflare.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22FC129793 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:05:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qcyFsgtcFR-X for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:05:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22c.google.com (mail-wr0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9CA6129722 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:05:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 89so156102075wrr.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:05:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=T8X1LZKNnMNFUX8oPJ17uXNJt7ZIDxOYrvJOaJMa+TI=; b=u8RneP/gPyrR26yFyuv1YfNfDarTH+yC6zX/kf903LxLTGGVGFGmVYzsva3WNO51Fm cyTQsEN+0ls+Uq8+c0OJ/Wb/hPdyRJPAIRwo5J46EUSLptMYwBEaT5eihQibGz0Kt4SM K+q/25Gd8EVedq+8r00aVksciKxHAko30qSls=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=T8X1LZKNnMNFUX8oPJ17uXNJt7ZIDxOYrvJOaJMa+TI=; b=td/mw66uEx9L7Sx7rYYVemj/Zw1C9CEfBm5QoWx9kijieErIjQFO11nN4vRVXC01AE i55vay3N1jvgOPzcgGobaEBXFNhxo/ynu7FFQeFd7ST3cmxQszeNgAC/HOUJ2kGpuzQ2 2TfViu/0NxhM/PCCKHyqb2YwgTujqKExCHHqb5g+9IDvVF/f10O6m2WuiHW3mq16zE4I yN5TGjFwQtylYcYAjPTTj/sIMH7NoLG/kOrrb0zz7OXMPlITDu0vNXWHeH8miMn/+tnJ sR+cwQY41foDmlcu9PP3UPa2d4U2xXqrY0+1DlXNGswQpwuXdoemvRg0OpmEVm73pfC/ DfOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kF2KbW2vEA5ahAaprRGBGz1XC74aR928mrYzgQWpDA9eVqIAAgKXvcMbFQOBYviWULK1rv3ktvX6iOk1Vj
X-Received: by 10.223.161.130 with SMTP id u2mr24033108wru.127.1487009154999; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:05:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.164.194 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:05:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAC94RYYTZa0nXT8zdb_LFgKxpAx3Dc4kHZpE68-oh_DSbZxd4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148661979638.4286.4234665114055399732.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC94RYZM+KMS2c3CVx=8Q005XYGQqNRv--23H7_aTpuY05tEMQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6NTqy9_jKXT4Fc9KhmcW7Fq6DTiU2HmzBoWn+YA1fALOh5zA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC94RYYhV0ye252bLNSGPmqQhdZ772AkaJ7us86X1j4nppsWDg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702131258580.23062@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAC94RYbSkp2h_jOBgmrP3oZouSigPp9xPVxoKxkYft55qMyiZQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702131642360.23062@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAC94RYZSLzv=SDMxXTh2ZWZJUbG0AtMhmO62ynCpg-WO8XJcYg@mail.gmail.com> <20170213173801.j7dpxzjy5morksg5@mycre.ws> <CAC94RYYTZa0nXT8zdb_LFgKxpAx3Dc4kHZpE68-oh_DSbZxd4Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?w5NsYWZ1ciBHdcOwbXVuZHNzb24=?= <olafur@cloudflare.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:05:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN6NTqwGd0UT4fWf6_-kKJ-e4v-gMdVsAKpzRvP1ErmVRhnOyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f3ed4766c2f05486d4ca3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-KsYKm_iPVQrx9Pe_Lv2dVqLF3k>
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:05:58 -0000

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws> wrote:
>
>> You think this would actually provide any sort of useful information? No
>> operator would understand what "MBZ: 0xNNNN" means without re-training,
>> and if you're re-training operators you may as well point them to this
>> document.
>
>
> I think it would be _very_ useful. People easily forget new information,
> but seeing unexpected data like that would provide the necessary trigger
> for remembering this document and e.g. retrying with +tcp.
>

Richard,

HINIFO is such a signal :-)
thus your request applies only to Send-one and Send-useful responses.
I do not think adding complexity will help at all.

 ... you want an overhead cost forever just because of "muscle memory"
learning curve for few people.

Olafur