IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03

Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> Thu, 16 July 2015 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A641A702C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYzOPA6IP8AQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time-travellers.nl.eu.org (c.time-travellers.nl.eu.org [IPv6:2a02:2770::21a:4aff:fea3:eeaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D54F1A01EC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 143-245-128-083.dynamic.caiway.nl ([83.128.245.143] helo=casual) by time-travellers.nl.eu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <shane@time-travellers.org>) id 1ZFfGC-0004mm-FX; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:15:20 +0000
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:15:19 +0000
From: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Message-ID: <20150716091519.47a6bbdd@casual>
In-Reply-To: <20150716003359.GD13926@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <CAEKtLiQWPM6yJZZASQ5k1bzsbHc3jv5FRsJ6ifgUdj9TRLCmRg@mail.gmail.com> <83A64168-3510-4E0B-AA23-54547C05990B@vpnc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1507141719130.32296@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <55A543CD.6010008@gmail.com> <CAEKtLiRQVgQRnm51gSb0e9zhmQ7vYVJXdPBQsSLXqHo_hiAKyw@mail.gmail.com> <20150716003359.GD13926@mx2.yitter.info>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-Le_QP5C37XXYEKxKDbE8n9Bk34>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:15:27 -0000

All,

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:33:59 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Casey Deccio wrote:
> > I am also concerned about the apparent urgency to get the initial document
> > out with points that admittedly remain contentious and/or where there isn't
> > WG consensus.  I don't think it needs perfection, but it seems unnecessary
> > to get the document published without further explicitly identifying and
> > considering the standing issues.  We've haven't had this document
> > before--I'm not sure what the rush is now.
> 
> Just on this issue, and speaking only for myself (but as one of the
> people behind this document), my view is that this WG has historically
> been one of the places where documents go to die, and I am unwilling
> to go through the exercise of proving again how great an enemy of the
> good the perfect can be.  I'd be much more inclined to remove the
> contentious definitions and publish that document than to try to get
> things perfect.

I totally agree, on all counts.

Cheers,

--
Shane

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status