Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00
Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk Wed, 21 October 2009 10:24 UTC
Return-Path: <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35A43A697D for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.655
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.655 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.943, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LLBA1ZswCGXu for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nominet.org.uk (mx4.nominet.org.uk [213.248.199.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C1D3A67F8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 03:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc: Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:Message-ID:From:Date: X-MIMETrack:Content-Type; b=J4amFAi49CzvjhPMYUtb66Qrsg+bXm/GMDe0axZm7kyDy1hIQ1BtaZqC lgldL46M55+HC/+mzB/djqHj59SEZewjitYe8KmK8sCayjtHVPq+Wiav7 7ylqgB0bRFJ3gEb;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nominet.org.uk; i=Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt; s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1256120652; x=1287656652; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk|Subject:=20Re:=20[DNSO P]=20Fw:=20New=20Version=20Notification=20for=0D=0A=09dra ft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00|Date:=20Wed,=2021=20 Oct=202009=2011:24:08=20+0100|Message-ID:=20<OF587F6CED.2 171D8E9-ON80257656.0038FB59-80257656.0039244B@nominet.org .uk>|To:=20Alex=20Bligh=20<alex@alex.org.uk>|Cc:=20dnsop@ ietf.org,=0D=0A=09Florian=20Weimer=20<fweimer@bfk.de>,=0D =0A=09Joe=20Abley=20<jabley@hopcount.ca>|MIME-Version:=20 1.0|In-Reply-To:=20<DCCD2E64CC23A041472BF4B5@Ximines.loca l>|References:=20<OFA656600E.F5229B3D-ON80257650.005247BF -80257650.00527644@nominet.org.uk>=20=0D=0A=09<82skde36c9 .fsf@mid.bfk.de>=20<DE23E9BF50E437E2D5CA65C8@Ximines.loca l>=09<82ljj61gle.fsf@mid.bfk.de>=20=0D=0A=09<200910202329 .n9KNT56j048843@drugs.dv.isc.org>=20=09<1F61DD04-14A6-434 9-8650-9CF27D27C3BC@hopcount.ca>=20=0D=0A=09<200910210145 .n9L1j8of033780@drugs.dv.isc.org>=09<8263a9xnem.fsf@mid.b fk.de>=20=0D=0A=09<OFD7B965B7.53CC1C17-ON80257656.0028D85 C-80257656.002974DF@nominet.org.uk>=20=0D=0A=09<82zl7luov 4.fsf@mid.bfk.de>=20<A0DDFB2F94500799B7F0B37F@Ximines.loc al>=09<82fx9dun7r.fsf@mid.bfk.de>=20<F7CC8A286D65EAC3E9C1 DF8F@Ximines.local>=20<82d44ht6kl.fsf@mid.bfk.de>=20<DCCD 2E64CC23A041472BF4B5@Ximines.local>; bh=hB1olOuLK5dj9ICP2hzn/bcqp5jjBjffaI8fIUa/1Ow=; b=l2aG3STnNEVMyW40Rpd+Qs4SjLMAYS8dol9oW7Q1WdGwD/7K1jmCjxKC 5GZlOh2S5u27fkfZLEPz/vA7Y+L0oL1OH8FO/DNyuV/CMG9Rjj4SnPAJa onjJBtZhM6F7g83;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,596,1249254000"; d="scan'208";a="13798915"
Received: from notes1.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.128]) by mx4.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2009 11:24:10 +0100
In-Reply-To: <DCCD2E64CC23A041472BF4B5@Ximines.local>
References: <OFA656600E.F5229B3D-ON80257650.005247BF-80257650.00527644@nominet.org.uk> <82skde36c9.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <DE23E9BF50E437E2D5CA65C8@Ximines.local> <82ljj61gle.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <200910202329.n9KNT56j048843@drugs.dv.isc.org> <1F61DD04-14A6-4349-8650-9CF27D27C3BC@hopcount.ca> <200910210145.n9L1j8of033780@drugs.dv.isc.org> <8263a9xnem.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <OFD7B965B7.53CC1C17-ON80257656.0028D85C-80257656.002974DF@nominet.org.uk> <82zl7luov4.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <A0DDFB2F94500799B7F0B37F@Ximines.local> <82fx9dun7r.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <F7CC8A286D65EAC3E9C1DF8F@Ximines.local> <82d44ht6kl.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <DCCD2E64CC23A041472BF4B5@Ximines.local>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008
Message-ID: <OF587F6CED.2171D8E9-ON80257656.0038FB59-80257656.0039244B@nominet.org.uk>
From: Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:24:08 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 7.0.1FP1 | May 25, 2006) at 21/10/2009 11:24:09 AM, Serialize complete at 21/10/2009 11:24:09 AM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0039244880257656_="
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:24:04 -0000
> That's easily remedied, and would be a good addition to the protocol. The > first thing the client does is send a query to the candidate new nameserver > (possibly with "Christmas tree" options, e.g. DO set and so forth), and > check the reply looks sensible. If not, it doesn't use it. That way it > doesn't use any server that makes things worse. The query could be an NS > query for ".", but perhaps better a fixed records in .ARPA that does exist > & is signed. I'm in meetings today so can't reply fully. We could simply propose NXDOMAIN.LOCAL.ARPA. as well. If the answer for that comes back the same as for DOMAIN.LOCAL.ARPA, we know we've got an "evil" resolver. :) Ray
- [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-be… Ray.Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification fordraft… George Barwood
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification fordraft… Ray.Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Ray.Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Alex Bligh
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… bmanning
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Ray.Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Alex Bligh
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Alex Bligh
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Florian Weimer
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Alex Bligh
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Ray.Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Alex Bligh
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draf… bmanning