Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 22 September 2016 03:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F5C12BF4B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w66lf0j4O4Su for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3672312BEED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y6so57211864lff.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W8xb+SjS7wfevc+d4HftzVDCShbqSOG4ilxfGYHqQ24=; b=ICXnJnrMHBZ7+WlTH3OOVYZ+rCrT1yfRtG24sukVcSYxDtxxEvfQyM4D14eueK4Jmh XKJblD0v8i+FmoDD/7sPVlESgaW9d9pWjkEVFH50bqZ+Hw9g6Kee3ef4xBx3PZV9wMqx xWjcvgbmcSAuls6EXWoh+ICZ7A6rY51WgbNBeqC5/QhKbb2KsdrVXyubNSzDhvCjYcYw UABsPxSYj4DlZ0Ga75/zJFj+eYGKvu1DercDzclJhgB2s6h3GU/xL2jOibIKIjGetIbc Otgh/r5aIYBFfj4/W17XhFCe1+0QEaWurkDFCKWNdKV5vxmvx6zDBuAOl+3FTKagTe3A lGZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W8xb+SjS7wfevc+d4HftzVDCShbqSOG4ilxfGYHqQ24=; b=a9JZLOkm9gEbN8KshCf45lwA2xzRbGE9zu7C+RpMv1xaJfVLZ2F/VDRspMevg0x4oO LaRQ96hN3VgzsD3A0pyFZgCNVrA/67Sy+qusvPs5SzcmGWMBX3MI4hI3qil4I1Kj2Ao6 Z2eVkkTWVD7NVEQb9l3TK8Kut6ynSISKEZr7fuY6zPEMaqEQ57u5+GLzw7pPBRr5CWiZ HpNnZQ+kLdNIrKo81OLGbNg7wdUraK7bjSqcltqkCv9cAiGKYFrRfDrrsQDIg5arHqqG wKW0UFj5K2J3SxDHDHvMLDG4T3aFdnunc37PPO/RLueNnKQuZMogqZI0HfOYb1gE4MqZ P2dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMFDclOQ+GBubW2LUYulJO7QeZVp6pCioDpiWKmsWAhW/3qxUPoh7iiCgqE+L9cpp7pVwWRkVk6ZhEqBw==
X-Received: by 10.25.28.19 with SMTP id c19mr16070059lfc.56.1474514783246; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 20:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <09D54753-BF30-4B9D-9EC6-994C2E0887CB@icann.org>
References: <CAHw9_i+UVH78URWzk+4x=j9BZiKfX3C+UeFU9vz1OfZ3tPeN1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160920133357.hbvtkrg5uwgzu4wh@nic.fr> <bdc67224-ec80-0732-d338-1d8e0376e7a9@gnu.org> <CAKr6gn0Dezee9JB1g+fBKqDsg4gHjau96S-ZTC4L4xpincsOwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1n-fZyn8u4sOTu6W2sh6XSOQGxGGv31ctgE4W6JLse+Ew@mail.gmail.com> <CAKr6gn3Ny+5sZvUJAmLuyFPYVJqMtV4auFcwGA1SR5VnmDX4mw@mail.gmail.com> <09D54753-BF30-4B9D-9EC6-994C2E0887CB@icann.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 23:25:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mY4Om6o42jdPYme6b0nDSyn4GpgB_P2cVQzpsjNSL9ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11401be8df32cb053d1039a9
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-Xhu5EPzzdxsXA1RXqpP_OVyASw>
Cc: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 03:26:28 -0000

I am not sure at this point, but I suspect the objection had to do with
section 6.3 of the -02 document that was published before Buenos Aires:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-02

Both documents mention 2860, and I don't see anything in particular to
disagree with about how the adpkja document references it, or, indeed, how
it referenced it in the -02 version.   However, the old section 6.3 does
remind me of some things I heard people objecting to in BA.


On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Alain Durand <alain.durand@icann.org>
wrote:

>
> > On Sep 21, 2016, at 8:31 PM, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> wrote:
> >
> > On the other hand, the longer documents goes further in recognizing
> > name processes are really inherently tied to ICANN process more than
> > technical merit arguments. This pleases me, because I feel drawn to
> > the view the problems are best expressed as "this is done by somebody
> > else, in another equity process"
>
> This is an interesting observation, as one of the comments we have
> received many times about the first revisions of draft-adpkja was that the
> references to ICANN were not helping. We even took heat for mentioning
> 2860...
>
> I guess this reflects on the multitude of diverging opinions on the
> subject.
>
> Alain.