Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 19 March 2018 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7600512946D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oaKg4raV8B5s for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18821273B1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-8ed0.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8ed0.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.142.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EA2D2421534; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:14:39 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALZ3u+bs+uDm16UiHp6fAF+EyrA9FBcbvYhRap76Wb6MCz_vOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:14:39 +0000
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <374BF611-71C4-4E37-A725-B214527328A0@rfc1035.com>
References: <3D490CA8-0733-47AD-A088-113B1116B207@vpnc.org> <CALZ3u+a9o1g0ZTkGjqWwfyV9phovEgu6Linp137yvM=JHSnj-A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+nkc8DrHTVkbPJDEGksnoN3e-DQtKV1=owOA5pLAUWG+depzw@mail.gmail.com> <CALZ3u+bs+uDm16UiHp6fAF+EyrA9FBcbvYhRap76Wb6MCz_vOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-b8h0iqxHZyAPC3ms_fOVZxqP0c>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Terminology question: split DNS
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:14:42 -0000


> On 19 Mar 2018, at 18:09, Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> Another issue here is that, for some enterprises at least, there's no
> single "internal network" anymore.

We don't need to enumerate every potential split DNS scenario (or how it's implemented). The original text says "there are many potential variants". That should be enough for this document. The simple example of one internal and one external net will do for illustrative purposes.