[DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-09: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I support Francesca's DISCUSS around use of SHOULDs.

Thanks for the fixes to IANA Considerations.  One minor issue remains, which is
that we're allowing an automatically-expiring document (an I-D) to set the bar
for what constitutes a valid Format Reference.  Given such a registration might
be permanent, a disappearing reference seems a curious choice.  The discussion
in the WG indicates that this is done to support experimental registrations and
the like; it might be good for the text to say so.