IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 02 March 2016 03:44 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E2A1B46CD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:44:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yUtpCrSySSEM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1021B46CC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:43:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87A71349315; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 03:43:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84B94160042; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 03:43:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B9E16004F; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 03:43:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id GNn3AKu-WX4i; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 03:43:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c110-21-49-25.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [110.21.49.25]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BEF98160042; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 03:43:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D484398E73; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:43:49 +1100 (EST)
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20160301165633.71260.qmail@ary.lan> <56D5CA62.1030206@bellis.me.uk> <CAMm+LwjJ0xe2wDW98JHJfV5jV3xTeuMNguU=rkqrZMzmei2iHA@mail.gmail.com> <20160301225138.53AFB438DCC1@rock.dv.isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603011813560.36649@ary.lan> <20160301233735.A4C0E438E1E9@rock.dv.isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603011859390.36649@ary.lan>
In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Mar 2016 19:01:34 -0500." <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603011859390.36649@ary.lan>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:43:49 +1100
Message-Id: <20160302034349.65D484398E73@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-fiAPkOM2PCo7GJC1TNeAdND_ik>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 03:44:00 -0000

In message <alpine.OSX.2.11.1603011859390.36649@ary.lan>, "John R Levine" write
s:
> >> I suppose I could say web based configuration crudware a few dozen more
> >> times, but I doubt it would sink in any more than it has before.
> 
> > Look at https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/summary.html.
> 
> I did.  It has nothing to do with configuration software or new RRTYPEs, 
> which demonstrates my point.

You missed the point that new code points are making their way into
production servers in a timely manner but if you want to see types
all the servers that supported expire also support:

a a6 aaaa afsdb apl caa cdnskey cds cert cname dhcid dlv dname
dnskey ds eui48 eui64 gpos hinfo hip ipseckey isdn key keydata kx
l32 l64 loc lp mb md mf mg minfo mr mx naptr nid ns nsap nsap-ptr
nsec nsec3 nsec3param null nxt opt ptr px rp rrsig rt sig soa spf
srv sshfp tkey tlsa tsig txt unspec uri wks x25

avc and openpgpkey are the only ones missing from that list and
openpgpkey has since been published (those that support cookie
support openpgpkey) and avc only got a code point allocated last
week.

It doesn't take years, in general, for new types to make it into
production servers.

Mark

> R's,
> John
> 
> PS: For a good time see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dnsextl
> ang/
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email