Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 26 January 2018 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94335126DEE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:59:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yFuqBGJCYg1w for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7F812DA23 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.109] (host81-148-171-98.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.148.171.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD5ED7594C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:59:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5A6B888A.5080508@redbarn.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 11:59:06 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.22 (Windows/20171208)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <9DCE2F63-EE37-4865-B9D6-6B79BBE05593@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcSirZyfr7PKhf=ttMxf=DeMVeJPNPn=R-HS2cH3Z-nPw@mail.gmail.com> <8e69dac2-359b-d528-45e5-05604f4dbf90@nic.cz> <CAJE_bqdeDRmN78dE5VUYDB6y-fXfUK9gSOkjJxszcP0WjjR9dw@mail.gmail.com> <20180126195453.GJ3322@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180126195453.GJ3322@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-g2sMXlVBm9BnlOMDNC4bIsaRM0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 19:59:11 -0000


Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
...
> If the intent is to require special handling of "localhost" in the
> platform's name to address lookup library (getaddrinfo(),
> gethostbyname(), ...), then the draft should say so, instead of
> talking about stub resolvers, which are only the DNS component of
> the platform's hostname resolution stack.

that's what it should say, and that's how it should say it. so, +1.

-- 
P Vixie