Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 19 September 2018 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C206126DBF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I_UQn43OqzFN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:51:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD9B41277C8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 09:51:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:38344) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1g2fhe-000L7W-gp (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:51:50 +0100
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 17:51:49 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1809191220150.32564@bofh.nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191750150.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191455190.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAOZSDgCGx73HhtkuQL8WQAhAxGv57h53c+R9xG=Es2sCejYDhw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1809191519260.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <5BA26022.5070202@redbarn.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1809191220150.32564@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-hGnvbJ7wybTavhTLZ2KzbL4c3g>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:51:55 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>; wrote:
>
> The design goals of a solution in this space should be:
>
> - Fully supports DNSSEC
> - Does not require AUTH server changes other then supporting a new
>   RRTYPE presentation / wire format and/or serving a new RRTYPE as
>   Additional Data.
> - All optimization work is done on the resolver. If this includes
>   'rewriting' A/AAAA records, DNSSEC proofs MUST be included for
>   stub clients doing validation.

My suggestion does all of that.
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg24206.html

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>;  http://dotat.at/
Tyne, Dogger, Fisher: Southwest 6 to gale 8, occasionally severe gale 9 at
first, decreasing 4 or 5 later. Rough or very rough, becoming high for a time
in northwest Fisher, becoming slight or moderate in Tyne and Dogger. Rain or
showers. Good, occasionally poor.