Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-00

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 16 December 2014 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A221A6F58 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:20:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.364
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.364 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cImmwxakgyGp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C96A1A6FFF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:20:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:180b:d4f1:7d12:2e82] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:180b:d4f1:7d12:2e82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A41B13B4E; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:20:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <549069CC.20309@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 09:20:12 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
References: <20141216152511.GA22255@totoro.home.mukund.org> <20141216171318.GA23468@totoro.home.mukund.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141216171318.GA23468@totoro.home.mukund.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040907000303010205020606"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-lNi35CyCRFiJHD1Xb8vAI66-uA
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 17:20:46 -0000


> Mukund Sivaraman <mailto:muks@isc.org>
> Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:13 AM
>
> Sorry, TCP also takes 2 RTT similar to UDP with DNS cookies. I had
> included the initial UDP query by mistake, but this won't be involved if
> TCP is directly tried.

3 round trips, 7 packets, for an isolated tcp/53 query.

s   ->
    <- s+a
a   ->
q   ->
    <- r+a
f+a ->
    <- f+a

obviously, the dickenson tcp change proposal bears on this, but today,
it's 3 rtt, 7 pkt, and that's assuming that the response fits in one
window. axfr is obviously much longer.

-- 
Paul Vixie