[DNSOP] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 20 May 2025 22:01 UTC

From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Orie Steele via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <174768631165.485945.17542801112153835514@dt-datatracker-59b84fc74f-84jsl> (Orie Steele via Datatracker's message of "Mon, 19 May 2025 13:25:11 -0700")
References: <174768631165.485945.17542801112153835514@dt-datatracker-59b84fc74f-84jsl>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 15:01:34 -0700
Message-ID: <yblo6vndjr5.fsf@wd.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-ID-Hash: RVKGQNFHNN4C36OMSLZW4WLZWZPKF44R
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Orie Steele <orie@or13.io>, draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8624-bis-09: (with COMMENT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-lnGfBi5nUYW9Muu0i07Yi5c_Gc>

Orie Steele via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes:

> ### Guidance to DEs for divergence?
> 
> ```
> 268        and "use".  We note that the values for "Implement for" and "Use for"
> 269        may diverge in the future
> ```
> 
> The divergence that is expected here is probably that there will be more
> implementation than use, right?
>
> Some additional guidance to DEs might be helpful here.

That would be the most logical.

added "as implementations generally precede deployments."


> ## Nits
> 
> ### KSK expand on first use.
> 
> ```
> 391        Upgrading algorithm at the same time as rolling the new KSK key will
> ```

Done, thanks
-- 
Wes Hardaker                                     
USC/ISI

[DNSOP] Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Orie Steele via Datatracker
[DNSOP] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-i… Wes Hardaker