IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?

Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> Sun, 05 July 2015 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <steve@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB221A1A6D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 04:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.782
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.782 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DSL=1.129, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d7tMUkEKUN40 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 04:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from execdsl.com (remote.shinkuro.com [50.56.68.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A861A1ABF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dummy.name; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 11:56:34 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150705115107.GA27268@sources.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 04:56:21 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <84F2EC9E-107B-4E78-AF1F-6DE987B7A915@shinkuro.com>
References: <20150704063120.2380.qmail@ary.lan> <017CF015-8A06-40D5-9ECF-B7B7E208C7AF@frobbit.se> <6F830DF3-9FD6-43A1-8E9A-5854958BA848@shinkuro.com> <20150705115107.GA27268@sources.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-sdYHbCJ6DdFFXL4no0yUPWXaoE>
Cc: "Stephen D. Crocker" <steve@shinkuro.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Some distinctions and a request - Have some class?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 11:56:38 -0000

On Jul 5, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 09:16:17AM -0700,
> Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> wrote 
> a message of 21 lines which said:
> 
>> except for the additional load it places on the root servers,
> 
> RFC 7535 could be a solution.
> 
>> I propose augmenting the DNS to include entries in the root that
>> serve the purpose of giving slow NXDOMAIN responses instead of quick
>> responses for those strings that the IETF has identified as not
>> TLDs.
> 
> If it is a serious proposal, I object. Delaying answers require
> keeping state in the authoritative name server and opens a nice DoS
> boulevard.

Hmm… It would be acceptable to simply dump requests for those names if the load is too high.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email