IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-03.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sun, 16 July 2017 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FDA12F28A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 06:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFj2sMsT51LM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 06:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F09F1200FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 06:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id C491931CA9; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:50:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 494AFEC0BB8; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:49:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:49:08 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170716134908.GB5654@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <149907291397.4998.8059630450980375262@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC94RYaY81Taq-iubcE+HRGGY7mLUAoLqSqFgyLWga5wCxfLSA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAC94RYaY81Taq-iubcE+HRGGY7mLUAoLqSqFgyLWga5wCxfLSA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/-wCLizsJF2TSty2e85Ekhbccyu4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 13:51:04 -0000

On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 07:22:14PM -0400,
 Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com> wrote 
 a message of 289 lines which said:

> * Communicate aggregation of IP addresses into prefixes (i.e., the
> irrelevance of least-significant bits in ip-address values) with new
> "client-prefix-length-ipv4" and "client-prefix-length-ipv6" and
> "server-prefix-length-ipv4" and "server-prefix-length-ipv6" file
> preamble configuration options.

Yes, it is very important in privacy-conscious settings, when you want
to blur the data.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email