Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00.txt

[Bob Harold <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:32 AM Normen Kowalewski <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Paul, Lada,
>
>
> On the comment for the wording in the line after the example in  3
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00#section-3>.
> YANG Design Considerations
>
>      typedef dns-class-name {
>        type enumeration {
>          enum IN {
>            value 1;
>            description
>              "Internet (IN)";
>            reference
>              "RFC 1035 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1035>";
>          }
>          ...
>        }
>      }
>
>    The other type, "rr-type-name", is exactly analogical.
>
>
> Maybe we could use the wording
>
>    The definitions for the other basic type, "rr-type-name” are derived in analogy to this structure, except that the IANA registry "Resource Record (RR) TYPEs” is the respective underlying data source.
>
>
> BR, Normen
>
>
> The other type, "rr-type-name", is exactly analogical.
>
> I'm not sure if "analogical" is a common word to use and might be a bit
> confusing to non-native speakers like me. I'm also confused about
> "exactly analogical". What would inexactly analogical be? :)
>
>
> Being another non-native speaker, I am open to suggestions
>
>
>
"analogous" is a more common form of the word, and could be used.  Or a
synonym like "parallel" or "similarly".

-- 
Bob Harold