IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 10 February 2017 09:15 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D831294B9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 01:15:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-k78RKCb6wi for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 01:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1380E129410 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 01:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A701C2807EC; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:15:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F3E2807B6; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:15:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (unknown [192.134.7.106]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F21AB3800C; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:14:39 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98F5C4008E; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:14:39 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:14:39 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170210091439.ow5dgowffir3xagt@nic.fr>
References: <CAH1iCipA5nvWJqjdGUwJeeT_eU8EH8VYJU2hX1hJoiTb617K8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170209163123.56hdbzaluekmvbh7@nic.fr> <20170209195722.DC1AB636586C@rock.dv.isc.org> <0394528C-99CD-41D4-9AB6-844D1318264C@gmail.com> <20170209204506.BC40D6365CBE@rock.dv.isc.org> <12D7473B-3A22-4A8D-9C13-2AEEDEABB879@fugue.com> <20170209224851.2FB1B63666E6@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCiqi_xJjwXvsR-x76fcz20NiugnjYqameK1ZHWd+54SLpw@mail.gmail.com> <20170209234726.D30AD6366A94@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAH1iCirdLita8=eGR6SqWGa0UKRx0aq=2XCvkmF6x=xjh4yfDA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCirdLita8=eGR6SqWGa0UKRx0aq=2XCvkmF6x=xjh4yfDA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 9.0
X-Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/0-vKOnYXprqqQLB-ircaZJUT2Bk>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 09:15:12 -0000

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:40:23PM -0800,
 Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 78 lines which said:

> If you really care about privacy, IMHO, the place to instantiate the
> private namespace, is under one of the heavily used AS112 zones.
[...]
> even if a leak
> occurs, it will be hiding among the sheer volume of crap.
> Plus, having the AS112 decentralization applied, means any incidental
> leakage is going to be nearly impossible to find.

This was proposed in draft-bortzmeyer-dname-root. But read its
Security considerations section: not everyone agrees that leaking to
AS112 is harmless.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email