IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 16 June 2020 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDEC3A0E3B; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vk6zBKhoqRis; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2CDC3A0DE3; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 08:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E9B424205EC; Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:09:06 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <D48DA38A-439B-4273-AB57-4974AE9DB972@internetstiftelsen.se>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 16:09:05 +0100
Cc: dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <81E30C4D-A8E8-4611-A7D2-D5EF00C4AB8F@rfc1035.com>
References: <CADyWQ+F=JA6fogcy_JGRJaZv=Hq52ozgmY5gmzfPm=1oHcJXKg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+nkc8DqHNPS4YL7Vm1+hGrFoXG-KKVzpxYsHDZvW5uCfEuQHQ@mail.gmail.com> <D48DA38A-439B-4273-AB57-4974AE9DB972@internetstiftelsen.se>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/084jfZWuczbRfJ9lLsI0D6c54Jc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:09:10 -0000


> On 16 Jun 2020, at 15:51, Mats Dufberg <mats.dufberg@internetstiftelsen.se> wrote:
> 
> I support the adoption and I am willing to review the document.

<AOL Mode>Me too!</AOL Mode>

I wish everyone else commenting on this thread just indicated if they supported adoption (or not).

Too much of the discussion that’s taking place at the moment seems to be about the content or metaissues around the I-D. That's premature IMO and should wait until the WG has decided to adopt the document. Or at the very least, the discussion should be taking place on another thread. And FWIW, the fact there’s been so much discussion suggests the WG should adopt the I-D.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email