IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] IETF meeting prep and what

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Fri, 18 June 2021 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F563A0E47 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H-j5gf8TPeX2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C47F3A0E46 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8C7E29026; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+ESB-W9DvdRjCrdXgaZUWzX5b5cUvu-Ue3zjRrVsnCB2w@mail.gmail.com> <5a9b35c5806e36b0802be493d87beb8ef2fef18d.camel@powerdns.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:21:05 -0700
In-Reply-To: <5a9b35c5806e36b0802be493d87beb8ef2fef18d.camel@powerdns.com> (Peter van Dijk's message of "Fri, 18 Jun 2021 19:40:45 +0200")
Message-ID: <ybltulu98e6.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/0BR3HopUI9MWG-XBe3Pi2w5IX7s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] IETF meeting prep and what
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:21:17 -0000

Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> writes:

> I propose replacing rfc5011-security-considerations

I keep meaning to republish it with Olafur's suggested reduced title
(since it's really describing just one problem).  But it's unlikely to
get published as an RFC due to lack of consensus after a long drawn out
conversation where most of the WG stopped reading due to the harsh
language of some messages.  It can probably be dropped from the active
list because of this.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email