[DNSOP] Idea/suggestion on refs
Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Thu, 11 July 2024 17:35 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB0AC14F5E5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ID3CubvD696J for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E09CAC14EB1E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-75a6c290528so784413a12.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720719320; x=1721324120; darn=ietf.org; h=to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+RrmHaPBuV/UDJKiUrhkoADtcsnECqXt8C3qa2i4oa0=; b=FMaHDAiQL3Zy/66/1LW7eVPdnMf/kuwut4YOmwjo9hSIwki0Lr90agrAoWKZYdAeKj y+xaD4ykQZv4WtIdbHF3t2tZIewWylC3FeV2pDuTlQXB971JV3r71k2yPtHzec6rhB+l 2bgIJBFfaCo9sR2kpNwKCwzdPqUq9LCjzkHO1G9i4/PsPzr6rdRSp/A/1gbR9Qm6tWjz mqNH+DfTFlJXtQGt6PiL4OVPmVpdyAa9JUD8Oiuol6LZWgfwRM7SHZNs5FH9POkpIMYw urdogG3+x/YW67qa7zccFXc+cm4bRe9t2MbVtVvwu0Cd0Pj0FLIshbOtxiDSdptodGdf yamA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720719320; x=1721324120; h=to:message-id:subject:date:mime-version:from :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+RrmHaPBuV/UDJKiUrhkoADtcsnECqXt8C3qa2i4oa0=; b=aFnC+8BOFa/SGejhSufVqC0onawZmxY6yr7hF2WGGL76nzJqCUWDHWFwqwhH2LIsSY IeyT8Asi5y7AnzT14qH7s8ii0wfybyuaDTaOfol0nnIS7/4lGNiHtiqTpLK/TpEu5jsy sQNUs7FePXOzxdwwBwH4qV9mNMVMUV6ix2N/jCWVkXfgGvasimRIEYOmgAQ0ZaTpccBL Xmy4VMK/sqQx5fWskGlgVbPnLxCYntid6GI2bp7F8PqsSn9WwNS/Z06nyNuV4Eyo7G1K VYXijMyTXnelb1mqj34ggoWSSL8u5YcVhuVQ0J4uyKTyW7QpwNFGmlclmFEeYBI05F5e qspA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzrdFq49WJ6HDMmPvgKIEV7+6/F3uXEj5BbDkdH9KAOqGzJ0VyH /AuDJCRY5a6l3w/r/SKe8zofcPRBB93vKaZt3P02/WjTP2DvROweJj0DCQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFhSxojpjS28/05invAKXviEbKbmYTvihbTL6QxHlAL86Q7uxNXALaZhMgU5D0uWLB6MyJSng==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a21:6da6:b0:1bd:2214:e92f with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-1c29821ffbdmr9588547637.14.1720719319563; Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:646:9d80:a1d0:8d:d514:f437:8b30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-70b4397ece4sm6147012b3a.144.2024.07.11.10.35.18 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 10:35:08 -0700
Message-Id: <81306BFE-EA86-41C4-B06A-E28BB88C0DCB@gmail.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21F90)
Message-ID-Hash: WCTEA3C6KJ2PTB26RFWZMJWHWAWNYFKQ
X-Message-ID-Hash: WCTEA3C6KJ2PTB26RFWZMJWHWAWNYFKQ
X-MailFrom: brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Idea/suggestion on refs
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/0BdL6H3Z8iZAlmqfpjYTmM2Yg-U>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
One of the potential challenges for RFCs is references to works-in-progress or other less-than-stable items (URIs). Here is my thought: would updating those be something that could be handled by errata rather than doing a -bis? Brian Sent from my iPhone
- [DNSOP] Idea/suggestion on refs Brian Dickson