IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Favor: Weigh in on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns?

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 27 November 2018 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000CC1277BB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:38:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ltlsjl2M4aS2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:38:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E13A126DBF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 07:38:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:51814) by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gRfRL-000r37-eJ (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:38:19 +0000
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:38:19 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1kk37y4jA_808HbLbR3ecU82-5L41xQbL3xkbP3BAPOiw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811271516370.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CAHw9_iL6CpLf6h_ysWEjvNjzaU2TPk-SyVGzLs_J9Yk_5A4OmA@mail.gmail.com> <9DBE5370-BEA4-48CE-B9FB-356ED1CCC1E7@icann.org> <CAPt1N1m1NoJoBPWJ5L96WwjrF6QEzB93pRxZpaHJxoBMpxtVRw@mail.gmail.com> <B4F27495-AA1E-44B3-B0DE-C228E0EDC84C@icann.org> <B00FCC13-587A-4E33-8BC9-D708EB6B4399@nohats.ca> <033DE6CA-B75E-4B06-A39E-323DCBBBC7A5@fugue.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1811271453020.3596@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAPt1N1kk37y4jA_808HbLbR3ecU82-5L41xQbL3xkbP3BAPOiw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/0GH3Wx59GrBOpgxW1icKkAJUyKo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Favor: Weigh in on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:38:26 -0000

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>
> Because of the experience with homenet, I actually sort of disagree with
> you about needing a general solution for this.   I think that the general
> solution for this is not to do it.

:-)

I was thinking more of "generally within the corporate context" - homenet
is (as you say) much more of a challenge. Within the corporate context I
think the general solution is to make this part of the managed machine
configuration (along with X.509 trust anchors, etc.), i.e. don't specify
the "internal" configuration details in-band, but just give the client
some kind of name for a collection of configuration settings it should
already have.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Southeast Biscay: Southerly or southwesterly 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in north.
Moderate or rough becoming rough or very rough. Mainly fair. Good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email