Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 20 June 2018 12:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0541310C3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KuzCeCJXfp7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CB3130E43 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.61.244] (unknown [104.247.56.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B72F89292; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5B2A4ADA.3020901@redbarn.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 08:38:50 -0400
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.25 (Windows/20180328)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ciDFoHBhxI1law==?= <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
References: <b73f3dc7-b378-d5d8-c7a2-42bc4326fbae@nic.cz> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1806191428250.916@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <691FC45D-E5B6-4131-95BF-878520351F3A@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <691FC45D-E5B6-4131-95BF-878520351F3A@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/0dZpnkJcTQ91IgC47R2BsS0Hy2o>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:38:59 -0000


tjw ietf wrote:
> With all of you here.
>
> As an Operator who gets these requests regularly (just 10 minutes
> ago!) when you tell users the  world of BIND/PowerDNS/NSD/Knot do not
> support such a mechanism they say “we’re off to use route 53.
> okthxbai “

there is a reason the spec doesn't support this. route53 does not care 
about those reasons; they have a business to run.

-- 
P Vixie