IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 16 March 2017 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E85129A54 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXQ7jwiRzhog for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 802AC129A52 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.31] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v2GKPtt1038168 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:25:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [10.32.60.31]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 13:26:01 -0700
Message-ID: <EEF8884C-9A7C-4379-B981-04E699821708@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <8CBB9AC5-9B3B-4F35-B3F3-AC239A199AE8@gmail.com>
References: <44B7CA03-47B4-4F78-AA1C-9EA558818144@icann.org> <8CBB9AC5-9B3B-4F35-B3F3-AC239A199AE8@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/0ePVtPjt7kF3L4H9IQcDIFFZxj0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:26:05 -0000

On 16 Mar 2017, at 12:59, Ralph Droms wrote:

> If you really are looking for IETF discussion and consensus on the 
> defining domain names, a third path would be an AD-sponsored 
> submission, independent of any WG.

Please do note that we already have such a discussion (that will go for 
IETF consensus) active in draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis. We've been 
asking for feedback on this topic already, and even you gave us some. 
:-)

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email