Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Thu, 05 November 2015 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7051A9075 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:21:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nux4kIAp32te for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 447971A8F3C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from i223-218-148-140.s41.a014.ap.plala.or.jp ([223.218.148.140]:60857 helo=Rays-MacBook-Pro.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1ZuRxs-0001Hn-Sk (Exim 4.72) (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 21:21:01 +0000
To: Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie>
References: <1E5B644E-EA0D-4287-8AB5-1907EE06BE1C@hopcount.ca> <563B58FE.50905@bellis.me.uk> <m2mvusfnlq.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <563BC83C.3050808@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 06:21:00 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2mvusfnlq.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1-1U4o2W6wpUb4SlTQ6A-3uqS28>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-jabley-dnsop-ordered-answers
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 21:21:08 -0000


On 06/11/2015 00:54, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

>   Wouldn't it be a simpler clarification to say that a client MUST NOT
>   depend on the order of the RRsets in an answer?

That's what I meant (blame jetlag).

Ray