Re: [DNSOP] lotsa TLDs, was One Chair's comments on draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Tue, 31 July 2018 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18973130E0F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wh-vra8lgh5s for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E299127AC2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41g2Vb0RjCzDvP; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:50:15 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1533055815; bh=9wH1drounq55jZkslAqNulr9uRh8NEZKH559PIPFBbI=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=clvYm5LKycb5GSkQL8DX9LwcfyG0lZwL468+dZz3rm7vCeUbZo4KaUyh0fxZkHuPa 75Off8WgblpeZ4Omw9kTrcInRLds+fX/8lPePhHiDta1YP98kFXGHr8mo8gNCHIib8 dPzNJHh30jpMCee3YyEwwTerIHqerZEhgJJlZdTQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2WEN6OfCmeo; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:50:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 18:50:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E67BB914; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca E67BB914
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90004009E6E; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:50:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:50:10 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <02DCB63D-AF3C-4486-869C-70E5704CDDCF@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807311248540.13952@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20180731160419.C7C13200318C42@ary.qy> <02DCB63D-AF3C-4486-869C-70E5704CDDCF@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/15ZG53a0zH_1f1PZBE6aqqR9KiI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] lotsa TLDs, was One Chair's comments on draft-wessels-dns-zone-digest
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:50:21 -0000

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> On 31 Jul 2018, at 9:04, John Levine wrote:
>
>>  So, yeah, there are plenty of TLDs you could pre-cache if you wanted
>>  to.
>
> This would only be useful for zones whose children don't change often and 
> whose TTLs are long. Many TLDs don't have those properties. Let's focus on 
> the ones that do.

And are small enough, so it is mostly the new gTLD vanity domains. I'd
rather not preload those 500 domains every couple of hours/days.

Paul