IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 26 January 2018 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4757126CD6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:06:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54wyaxrrxE-4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:06:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x229.google.com (mail-it0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E98FA126C3D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:06:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x229.google.com with SMTP id k131so1292118ith.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:06:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=s12V2i3bNC2xVJBYieSGWSZS2A4Fkzv2+zqg3qz6xwU=; b=uYCJIUA7Cv01NBZ8l9CCPAgvVmmuGNnRyXCLhup5UvO74Ryb+hHdjfCVhX3Xzf4ec1 vGm0uFtrH5YZ1FBOGmH6BBHeLFcA+yHpTgQZLBdJbI3Ctg3KWfF/UNCAkThPn2lGHfiu e3ZllvfZDon07OIbZo1kr38So6GpYO3qhy9OG7nS+uTev7Jf25l97fGhgektSuN9JHxo 3X1e7wrvaowBFFyoSPViKCO8x4SKKTheP6ncIhtakQ3/3YSm+GCSu/J260NpLwgZDp5p 6SpC0upRsNE+LgtOJ/+b+arzvvZ27oy2IFtzAX3sNYJkFyH5+oKpMBRobGgZ5UaO6lwJ J/NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=s12V2i3bNC2xVJBYieSGWSZS2A4Fkzv2+zqg3qz6xwU=; b=c2JYUJm/j57GvkVURIln0x2+0VRx6tMVC3b/a3lsJPWg0NJHyWhJoD8VK0h+xKikCG P6DkEBrbh2ssBkQTjMeFAecV2oOlVU+VunEAcN0wMUgZpMJiuqZ0WqhNgQ7/2lkQ+eff G6SG7uCGBgTU19pX/Td0UPkOj8CDFo2AZInfPz8Y+4b3OkrBdgeTf+ItMDMdrosrdPDN lrUvVDGbs+a2qG33/+3B7nVDXfNT6Wo0CLssfd7B/VGY/arWe0VAH66E85lEp6P6eFU4 /2PRvxIEY+3LZXVQ2MXrlnIotk0bHSZe0UZC9PUzs8S0f58SYAc5unqXnq/zaveN12iU +hAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcplSlK1k4wAQUhsDov99OyogjaZSgwGewbn0qBpQ4KIS0xnRf6 uQhIwZU1E6e50WOgv92jjSCH7ys2NSfYTz6yRK5+DA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2259Mykxwc/9X7KxYmMgUjr5AU+nfarsxIQHLUfo0KUWA61OhTCTEWjhDjNsp09b8/9e4pYmO4kxvqlkSlSlW38=
X-Received: by 10.36.87.14 with SMTP id u14mr17393337ita.7.1516986389187; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:06:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.241.202 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:06:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.79.241.202 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 09:06:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20180126161932.GH3322@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <20180125203549.GD3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <95B1FF6E-A9C3-4679-BE15-2066B9030CD6@fugue.com> <CANV=THh6bOxd_UW=TuLonWzz0KyGapkGWpMiNuu54W=45gFAvg@mail.gmail.com> <20180124205620.GZ3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1801251558440.5022@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20180125203225.GC3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <20180126004807.GE3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <D34C1BCF-E281-4167-89C6-CFFA12191707@fugue.com> <20180126013725.GF3322@mournblade.imrryr.org> <1F773B1D-B1E6-4DF0-809B-F255CDA1B927@fugue.com> <20180126161932.GH3322@mournblade.imrryr.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 12:06:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=vRX2On7e4zeaXhssZi99AS2ZRizeqpRJSy-SsB5dkig@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113752e4db65260563b0ea6e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1CiiHyTRWdH466HfCVjrP3XTeLc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 17:06:32 -0000

"Hack" is an expression of praise where I learned it. But it implies that
you are using something outside of it's design envelope, which you are.

I don't want to get into a long back and forth on this. I think I
understand your objection. I don't think it's a valid objection. But it's
up to the chairs to call consensus, not up to you or me.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email