Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43345126DD9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pUipELVQh21v for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A665129494 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v127so135650771qkb.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=CBx7UWiEAR2KsRKFJc1DfUBLKX0OcZMUR/e2FWx+CIE=; b=PiM8g1NqjaPl9zuQR/MqmlAm3oEm6drwtmV/BbJUtfBzTqTPYDVijq2UNL2mZIJRl8 TiGxKXmlZ0P2abePW+JLRFcXgpEoyF7d7WnWGVzY8ox9cTWo5Q32A+5R2TedxHMLZf7D 19Cg2biZhR/Cm+OwwED9TmlolbshahKZQVYA0XQyab4uypVGwzZ3kdUpwtcKh88AX6yh mIQ1TR0HO7hiY21S8FidrswpgbMqC+p1i8gt3lxvMBIrqNGZJSPtNVPSIb1aPU0EsZ89 PImpcRsClRDRJjyJWCL7AUtRE5jISojF/xb/wW+vfS4WJWoNOVh7BvgyZOt3WlzWkVyD WSXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=CBx7UWiEAR2KsRKFJc1DfUBLKX0OcZMUR/e2FWx+CIE=; b=o/MFjpMNhHcYAaS+yo/xGIPoeJvGrqPMl3J6lnN3oUsBlX72n5NNmAK8lXuPSdA4oB kLy6FM9pCNhmVNdl0zuB+H1Ba7Znt7bGJAlPD0ySHFDMt/TOuPESFBQ63RjiZ1bcME/M kLPMuqum0ZNAN9BxZIguyR7jqa4vqPQBD2n3fZFv6TaqhsNxUSaxT/DBrL+TaWK86IK3 o1XRUKaS7ZRLHpFfK+IQ8gTEtTHcMacu3Fel/1XvHgTa7cUEqtxaOL9kkB40s2T2v/Dn JeMEZknIJCqht8iS02Av4f/C1Oq5b+vm6W3NXLypDgYADfg7vmg7JI5f59VwVIUxrI++ V3eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3AwCvGHTrGQS9sSx+72F9dACkglyGnanEngJGFOjyJXtFQVwTCiJcW36upJBs1rA==
X-Received: by 10.55.183.133 with SMTP id h127mr33340069qkf.121.1490105267356; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:f006:56a3:f121:7c9b? ([2601:18f:801:600:f006:56a3:f121:7c9b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm14766899qkd.56.2017.03.21.07.07.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 07:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m1cqKPa-0000FeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:07:45 -0400
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <71F88034-72C5-4AEE-9ACE-3493A1173634@gmail.com>
References: <E07AFAEB-2B84-4610-87E7-94CF32CF3761@fugue.com> <7652B138-FEAB-4138-91FB-D71AFE6BEF2C@vigilsec.com> <6DCFBC9D-666A-4A3C-A418-82BB6AE3D25D@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703210928390.28925@bofh.nohats.ca> <m1cqKPa-0000FeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-2@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1HEiu-LDUixM5WDLIl78Zf1S9Mc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:07:50 -0000

> On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-2@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> 
>> This .home / .homenet issue has already been going on for a very
>> long time. The longer we wait with resolving this issue, the worse
>> the deployment situation will be of software mixing .home vs
>>> homenet.
> 
> Do we really expect homenet to be only ever used in a 'home'? It seems to
> me that homenet is an interesting technology that would work in any small 
> IPv6 network, i.e. a small office. 
> 
> In that context, using the string 'homenet' would be very confusing to users
> outside a home context. Maybe reserving a name that has less context would
> be better.

If draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03 specified homenet.arpa, the IETF could assign as many different names as wanted for different scoping scenarios, without interacting with ICANN for each assignment.

Just sayin'

- Ralph

> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop