Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format

Tim Wicinski <> Fri, 20 July 2018 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E048130FC4; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:57:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xgzo4RgWa286; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66EA13123D; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id v25-v6so10287168wmc.0; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8AK/YrnRK1jJpcmiDthtkEAsiS1zfsOk68/quf70ggE=; b=pBfPSEEwLtgZDwlt5/N9acKK/TU0xAKe4F/JoeMhVURDd2sC5PcmsdwgZTnZM5wSfh qPuVeiztXXKuF677OpTmE2PfFouUnKbBtluXKuUEHAx/UxjAQNNswFEMbZ26M1LBAN8R VuIBvSUxJTzsRcaFrAJvukO9viB2A402BuUlwA2wSo75mCcwThbiEqr2wI21+i33Wwfu S8fy8y8P3uT+vP8xdw+FqbnC0Q8hhdu0ZsQugYp1jdv73FuyhmUqDn+JqyjL8yhJckKx +TPQl0c/YPI/Ftsk+BrGOonk8XfHN0ajo1Kyi6WbCqOqnJNMw/6NMxpl3HXpWCfOSS9S BNQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8AK/YrnRK1jJpcmiDthtkEAsiS1zfsOk68/quf70ggE=; b=uOgcHo04vxy4WVViOkBL3d4hlkiLLVhc7uVagJk1nUTKFO3Bpyk6PJpiMQzSwQPnhK vNX93SbWYdLRNKM4yliKQox9LST16FLehS6c13bdwzbsfs0EPtfAEy5Pr1ZHlWqRXfOT FBTVKEzFgBY70ojjaAuhiqGSoPX3hjwwOrpqtYmYEqut36QKaScy0Q+q2oOGT+q0LpeX Lc8xghAzvC6wvrl1F9BwqWZjO7QK2db+XgmxsZ2W9gqfEdBrOpEGi41ebrymAFQmmqUZ H6ouD4mwMkkRRuY7ZybifQqTQAQqC1+r6j/5E/PLv4gyWj7S9xAfgMWUiVTdW3jwJ0ta lA0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFjB0lByKJBdYdEdPOKg96I0E8KE3drVfWPzAJZSUnU4XickAse GGWos91krfSfKYGFsa6ddZb3e9j2G9fxbAPslSfH9H3b
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdGUQY9TyNs0qoNq30Zvy1ceW2m2ZKNxnfchK08xuVKKfbAkG62OQMO3eMLPT6lPo63ny3wfD08iYM2LOsne3I=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:98a:: with SMTP id 132-v6mr2167179wmj.86.1532109428260; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:57:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:adf:a414:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 10:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
From: Tim Wicinski <>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:57:07 -0400
Message-ID: <>
To: dnsop <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003a846205717206a1"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:57:15 -0000


The WG Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format and the chairs
feel we have enough consensus to move this forward.

HOWEVER,  two things did come up with some reviews that happened in the
last few days:

- The packet format has a version number, but the draft does not document
or explain this.

- There is a concern that the math on the packet size may be slightly off.

Sara has agreed to work on the text for the version number, and I agreed to
sit down and count all the bits and make sure things are accurate.

Sara will be on Holiday until August, so we hope to have these issues
sorted out "very soon" and we will move this along.  I'll work on the
Shepherd write up (unless someone in the working group wants to do it!) as


On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Tim Wicinski <> wrote:

> All,
> We feel that the authors have addressed all outstanding issues, and this
> document is ready to move forward.  Also, the chairs wanted to kick off
> this Working Group before Montreal so if there are any issues that need
> some face time, we'll have it.
> One thing which arose early in the process was the issue of IPR and how
> it would be resolved.  The simple answer is that it is resolved farther
> up the process chain.   I spent time reading RFC 3979 on this topic:
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-f
> ormat
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Standards Track
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.  If this does not
> seem appropriate please speak out.  If someone feels the document is *not*
> ready for publication, please speak out with your reasons.
> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:  20
> July 2018
> thanks
> tim