Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format

[Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]>]

All

The WG Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format and the chairs
feel we have enough consensus to move this forward.

HOWEVER,  two things did come up with some reviews that happened in the
last few days:

- The packet format has a version number, but the draft does not document
or explain this.

- There is a concern that the math on the packet size may be slightly off.

Sara has agreed to work on the text for the version number, and I agreed to
sit down and count all the bits and make sure things are accurate.

Sara will be on Holiday until August, so we hope to have these issues
sorted out "very soon" and we will move this along.  I'll work on the
Shepherd write up (unless someone in the working group wants to do it!) as
well.

Thanks
Tim


On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 8:32 PM, Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> All,
>
> We feel that the authors have addressed all outstanding issues, and this
> document is ready to move forward.  Also, the chairs wanted to kick off
> this Working Group before Montreal so if there are any issues that need
> some face time, we'll have it.
>
> One thing which arose early in the process was the issue of IPR and how
> it would be resolved.  The simple answer is that it is resolved farther
> up the process chain.   I spent time reading RFC 3979 on this topic:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3979#section-10
>
> This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-f
> ormat
>
> Current versions of the draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format/
>
> The Current Intended Status of this document is: Standards Track
>
> Please review the draft and offer relevant comments.  If this does not
> seem appropriate please speak out.  If someone feels the document is *not*
> ready for publication, please speak out with your reasons.
>
> This starts a two week Working Group Last Call process, and ends on:  20
> July 2018
>
> thanks
> tim
>