Re: [DNSOP] the root is not special, everybody please stop obsessing over it

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Thu, 14 February 2019 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4104A128B36 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:41:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Q8wNCOs_B4j for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8B191289FA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:41:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E5F13AB05C; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 246E8216C1C; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:41:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:41:11 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20190214234111.GA87001@isc.org>
References: <b45edb5e-1508-0b02-a14c-a5be4ca9c0e6@redbarn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b45edb5e-1508-0b02-a14c-a5be4ca9c0e6@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1OXDKHM1xodbFii5UGOe5WiPmlg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] the root is not special, everybody please stop obsessing over it
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:41:13 -0000

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 01:57:14PM -0800, Paul Vixie wrote:
> unbound has pioneered a bit of this by automatically refetching data 
> that's near its expiration point.
[...]
> _that_ would be complexity worth its cost. 7706 was not. HAMMER is not. 

I'm confused, what's the difference between HAMMER and the thing you said?

(Which BIND also does, incidentally.)

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.