Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

[hellekin <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 05/13/2015 05:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> which means that ICANN is sitting on $3.7 million in
> application fees which they will presumably have to refund, as well as
> five withdrawn applications from parties who got partial refunds and
> would likely expect the rest of their money back, so we can round it
> to $4 million riding on selling those domains.
>
*** Maybe that means the business model of ICANN is not fit for the
technical model of the Internet?  I don't think it's IETF role to lower
technical expectations and requirements for the Internet to fit anyone's
business model.

That.  I said it.

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVU8HtXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFQ0IyNkIyRTNDNzEyMTc2OUEzNEM4ODU0
ODA2QzM2M0ZDMTg5ODNEAAoJEEgGw2P8GJg9QwgP/20CeLAn03JP7H8WIdkcQPPe
MQuDq+fXdTwLXKOnHET2m4C8bM4feJ5yymk2OVHvhrtkB+s/ikYu8rBs1E4pJ6wh
QsEW+yfWPPF2bVZW3Hpwn7eCu22mmZL42mzF14t1gwMbwuYeoWvLmjfR03X/HFoz
derWEH7TmkbWHmJzcrqxNx7k7PyTuBPpsCHv/JJAyaJxfhzsCtH/XqFv+duNYdf5
Zb8US6frSU48TrUZnwDCPycUFRX/FcjMDKKeCwTayc5jGBTZcSqiT2aAcAo0dlOM
GXzZg2XU2Z3CVfAYcmcsRE6inKVdXXegYtux4eSP3PZSR7+B7D8YE330T2QcG6At
ftUpxSsIWHM7rHaQXHK2Jd8OOavYDCpdChfk8OxbVaqkxVX5UrbDM+TC+borDe3+
wfTtISsHDLP08EPmXERU0G4CuGOO6MwEFlNkZv7DzthwEMjogIfalxEwg1PRnuD/
RoTpLvteJNnAlIN6hEi/5Vt8Xo2YvV3X5aorBA04M+eQVUlXN+AbsmiXm7z0lU2D
6sCGl0DGCiK/C7OqBPNT7pcJaPHZDawt7HC1ynJuOu+oDupzFng3/rNXzTPn5539
KfyTceEX5v0CbOAGvFSQUHKyBM21pG/W0M/SWUpkmKg/A9J/loJNNUn1le3+8Jxw
/h/rzSypoUibCj2wLHCQ
=a4Ah
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----