Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02
神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Thu, 25 January 2018 19:23 UTC
Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8EF12EA54 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:23:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQ-55a9kvzdZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24ABC12EA53 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id t16so8769123wrc.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:23:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=S/h/fjPlC+Tsqmsv55ACJD0CG/A+s1qxKFV5fz+OmiQ=; b=cgA3dT0FmCqqS9G5pIJWGpfJpqNiLpSuyVBitYNZJYGUxnPXs3v/bwKa0d7vooKc/B nrmApWZrTBSCQ7obyVnbLBoX2Vtr3f6YXjjElwpbEMT5dBAr8gjMben81RQbuKtBdq/s QjEAFZi2QVMgOvGCmjlKtWXE8yC+Ao1fQop5qI36xLSuHh/fsmOQ7fxFODV4kXLPCP8Q niYR8Ao1e4t5EF3NeTdbXUU16Gb5bHPp9VJfyWIeDqOl7wNujAYMaApCM40ehsicxaZR I/bz4/cQlOsaBySmduvwOPQUwzInIDH8SGETBGiUjLfckXS9uJyjkOmY0U277RSMjYIU GzBw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S/h/fjPlC+Tsqmsv55ACJD0CG/A+s1qxKFV5fz+OmiQ=; b=eWNRMo7aN6Uf5TjPRLECr/9kmvydAcVkLnQCXTDpbsnyeG6KPWrlRkt/3kJ++IB4pT 7jdDWMsfZCa/8lhi7MFYzWR8AzW8oF1va34nqqyp6axkEnOXcPLaV4EXhRe59SaUuKqq 50I5x6xxVclLHMsHWXfzSq2ONc4LbP8O0bnsJjsXpvM7V9YXeLk5KPEfv1IfOYdFHMOY wW3Toxg2SXrsndJbZdXNYJXF3gXIWPDNYjMzfzl3Q73GJ7LFCK3BczFFOGunbY2gOKpl s4MKWNXKLUZl4dXXxLBItdIGtx9++Doss4iS6VfNfA+adGeRwkj0V81EZVEDD8uty93N Ez3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytcAL7TtEP508R/cK25louea0fA35t7u69o2fkYb6iMjj6gO9AX/ spIrC/35x9VoUsC/mGRVlOxXjFhGiV2ICC4+Bzs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225czjueWP7iaRosxbMzeP7d/SRMAjMwRBWtsi3LQqYXfzhNSOnB+vuKM3GcyiN4g7csxy1K7BxVbibdrgNWpGc=
X-Received: by 10.223.158.195 with SMTP id b3mr9466306wrf.236.1516908218323; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:23:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.223.133.183 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:23:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <9DCE2F63-EE37-4865-B9D6-6B79BBE05593@gmail.com>
References: <9DCE2F63-EE37-4865-B9D6-6B79BBE05593@gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:23:37 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 28DF6gSEDD-XlSbod2dBDFo4MIc
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcSirZyfr7PKhf=ttMxf=DeMVeJPNPn=R-HS2cH3Z-nPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1aJJEb_FP1u26OT2GWqUfaA75tk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-02
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 19:23:42 -0000
At Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:18:08 -0500, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote: > Please focus feedback on: Is this draft ready to go to the IESG for > approval as an RFC? If not, can you suggest specific changes it > needs? I myself don't have a particular opinion on whether to send it to the IESG, but I don't think it's ready for it based on my understanding of the WG discussion so far. In particular, I don't think I saw a wg consensus about one major objection to the idea: "I'd like to keep my right of configuring my DNS servers (authoritative or recursive) to return whatever I want to 'localhost' queries". Again, I personally don't claim this right, but I see the concern. If my observation is correct and the WG has actually not reached a clear consensus on this, I believe it should first achieve it. If I miss a reached consensus, I wouldn't oppose to it, but I believe the draft should discuss how/why it justifies dismissing such concerns. Some specific comments on the 02 version follow. - (editorial) Section 1: This increases the likelihood that non-conformant stub resolvers will not go undetected. This is a kind of double negation ('not...undetected') and it was difficult to me to understand it on a first read. I'd suggest revising it to, e.g: This increases the likelihood that non-conformant stub resolvers will go detected. - Section 2 The domain "localhost.", and any names falling within ".localhost.", are known as "localhost names". I'm afraid this definition can be a bit ambiguous. It could read as if "a.localhost.example.' is a 'localhost name'. I'd suggest: The domain "localhost.", and any names ending with "localhost.", are known as "localhost names". - Section 3 1. Users are free to use localhost names as they would any other domain names. It's not clear to me what this sentence means. - Section 3 7. DNS Registries/Registrars MUST NOT grant requests to register localhost names in the normal way to any person or entity. It's a bit awkward to me to use an RFC2119 keyword for what registries/registrars should (or should not) do. - Section 5.1 In this case, the requirement that the application resolve localhost names on its own may be safe to ignore, but only if all the requirements under point 2 of Section 3 are known to be followed by the resolver that is known to be present in the target environment. I don't understand this sentence, especially the phrase "if all the requirements under point 2 of Section 3 are known to be followed by the resolver". Point 2 of Section 3 talks about application behavior (and I interpret "application" is a user of resolver, not resolver itself), so what does it mean by "known to be followed by the resolver"? - Section 5.2 Hosts like "localhost.example.com" and "subdomain.localhost.example.com" contain a "localhost" label, but are not themselves localhost names, as they do not fall within "localhost.". I suggest: 'as they do not end with "localhost.".' (see my comment on Section 2 above). - Section 6.1 Some application software differentiates between the hostname "localhost" and the IP address "127.0.0.1". You might also want to refer to ::1 here. -- JINMEI, Tatuya
- [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-b… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Darcy Kevin (FCA)
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… 神明達哉
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Lanlan Pan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Åke Nordin
- [DNSOP] Search lists revisited (Was: WGLC for dra… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Search lists revisited (Was: WGLC for… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Search lists revisited (Was: WGLC for… Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Suzanne Woolf
- Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localho… Stephane Bortzmeyer