[DNSOP] .arpa

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Wed, 22 March 2017 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8C2129447 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIE6NHrEXUhh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9B6124281 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (shaun.rfc1035.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B77242125A; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <0A544BEC-F719-4A7B-99E4-DC878EBE7B0C@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:05:28 +0000
Cc: IETF dnsop Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <63DEB599-B4CD-4664-9AB6-9F505D81EDA7@rfc1035.com>
References: <E07AFAEB-2B84-4610-87E7-94CF32CF3761@fugue.com> <7652B138-FEAB-4138-91FB-D71AFE6BEF2C@vigilsec.com> <6DCFBC9D-666A-4A3C-A418-82BB6AE3D25D@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703210928390.28925@bofh.nohats.ca> <m1cqKPa-0000FeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <71F88034-72C5-4AEE-9ACE-3493A1173634@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703211011170.30281@bofh.nohats.ca> <0A544BEC-F719-4A7B-99E4-DC878EBE7B0C@gmail.com>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1edyhgX_O_co0NfdVMOG-vpJdpE>
Subject: [DNSOP] .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 07:05:33 -0000

> On 21 Mar 2017, at 14:53, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:
> RFC 3172 was written in 2001…

RFC 3172 was an attempt to rewrite history and contrive an acronym: Address and Routing Parameter Area - really?

> Respectfully, I’ve always wondered who has this problem (US or non-US) besides network infrastructure geeks Of a Certain Age (yes, including myself, and many IETF participants).

It's a convenient tool for those hostile to USG "control" of the Internet: ie the US military is responsible for everything under .arpa, the US military's ARPA has still got some special status in the operation/development/control of the Internet, etc, etc. [And say things like "if .arpa isn't for US military control, why can't the string be changed?" or ".arpa hasn't been renamed since the Internet started 25-30 years ago. That proves ARPA/DoD is in charge of the Internet.".] It's utter nonsense of course. But that doesn't stop government officials and policymakers from making these arguments. I have seen them do this many times. Sigh. RFC3172 didn't make things better.