Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Thu, 14 May 2020 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F88C3A092E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=g001.emailsrvr.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58Ag_DI28anP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp119.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp119.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9BC3A092A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=g001.emailsrvr.com; s=20190322-9u7zjiwi; t=1589424236; bh=iQOztjhyhvWHWJaoEwX5J3WTkubHtuX9rRofJWOX9R4=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:From; b=eHSmfx4A2lSQaCVHg2gMFds+XYwf7xA28eHmvWO0ZORLN90QHEih3EI7dAqxKUlRs nQXSfc50GUR5M1OgDG6j93icDz3z2IH2fMkFjnk2gK6zRr5qvgpy0PoA9XUM+R7+7b ZcmGsvNc5UxL7Eum6dO/uQabsjM5sLUINIW9Uteo=
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp15.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 2277F2013C; Wed, 13 May 2020 22:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from [192.168.6.34] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [96.231.186.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 13 May 2020 22:43:56 -0400
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Message-Id: <8DF32635-8A42-40C9-8B04-DD04107AD96A@ogud.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6938147A-7A90-4826-99BF-EA33C408802D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:43:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EH4oyEdDZys5vxhPGgw_kAqNetL1oM775w6dJodSPJQA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
To: Tim WIcinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+HHBqFX_GhzuXD5FNwSUHBzeqTy3pWWvz41ZjPhx=2PyQ@mail.gmail.com> <02472848-7B62-4613-AE9B-218C2709E397@ogud.com> <CADyWQ+EH4oyEdDZys5vxhPGgw_kAqNetL1oM775w6dJodSPJQA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Classification-ID: f03c8897-d85a-483e-8377-353c4e2b000f-1-1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1xcxlxIx9sc_do3KK09AXlDmGv4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 02:43:59 -0000


> On May 12, 2020, at 9:43 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Olafur
> 
> Currently it's marked Standards Track, but I was working on the idea that the working group would make 
> that decision as the document works toward Working Group Last Call.  
> 
Tim 

Thanks for the clarification, 

> I was reserving judgement until there was implementations, interoperability, etc. 
> 
Fair point 

> Please feel free to register any thoughts on publication status at this time as well.
> 
> Hope that helps
> 

This draft is a result of a failure by the DNS community to create any kind of framework to manage distributed name server clusters. 
The draft is a “hack” of the best kind it is low impact but does the work for a sub-set of usage cases that a real control plane should have. 

I think making this document a standard would be a mistake.  
I think NOT publishing this document at all would be a  BAD thing. 

I support adoption and will review and continue to agrue against standards track. 

> tim
> 

Olafur

> 
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:35 PM Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com <mailto:ogud@ogud.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On May 11, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:tjw.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run
>> regular call for adoptions over next few months.  
>> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption.
>> 
>> 
>> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones
>> 
>> The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/>
>> 
>> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
>> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>> 
>> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>> 
>> This call for adoption ends: 25 May 2020
>> 
> 
> Tim, 
> a nit question: 
> what is the intended publication status ? 
> Experimental, Informational, Standard  
> 
> Thanks 
> Olafur
> 
>> Thanks,
>> tim wicinski
>> DNSOP co-chair
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org <mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>
>