Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F88C3A092E for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:43:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=g001.emailsrvr.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58Ag_DI28anP for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp119.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp119.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F9BC3A092A for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:43:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=g001.emailsrvr.com; s=20190322-9u7zjiwi; t=1589424236; bh=iQOztjhyhvWHWJaoEwX5J3WTkubHtuX9rRofJWOX9R4=; h=From:Subject:Date:To:From; b=eHSmfx4A2lSQaCVHg2gMFds+XYwf7xA28eHmvWO0ZORLN90QHEih3EI7dAqxKUlRs nQXSfc50GUR5M1OgDG6j93icDz3z2IH2fMkFjnk2gK6zRr5qvgpy0PoA9XUM+R7+7b ZcmGsvNc5UxL7Eum6dO/uQabsjM5sLUINIW9Uteo= X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com Received: by smtp15.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id 2277F2013C; Wed, 13 May 2020 22:43:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com Received: from [192.168.6.34] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [96.231.186.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 13 May 2020 22:43:56 -0400 From: Olafur Gudmundsson Message-Id: <8DF32635-8A42-40C9-8B04-DD04107AD96A@ogud.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6938147A-7A90-4826-99BF-EA33C408802D" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 22:43:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: Cc: dnsop , dnsop-chairs To: Tim WIcinski References: <02472848-7B62-4613-AE9B-218C2709E397@ogud.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Classification-ID: f03c8897-d85a-483e-8377-353c4e2b000f-1-1 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 02:43:59 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_6938147A-7A90-4826-99BF-EA33C408802D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On May 12, 2020, at 9:43 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: >=20 > Olafur >=20 > Currently it's marked Standards Track, but I was working on the idea = that the working group would make=20 > that decision as the document works toward Working Group Last Call. =20= >=20 Tim=20 Thanks for the clarification,=20 > I was reserving judgement until there was implementations, = interoperability, etc.=20 >=20 Fair point=20 > Please feel free to register any thoughts on publication status at = this time as well. >=20 > Hope that helps >=20 This draft is a result of a failure by the DNS community to create any = kind of framework to manage distributed name server clusters.=20 The draft is a =E2=80=9Chack=E2=80=9D of the best kind it is low impact = but does the work for a sub-set of usage cases that a real control plane = should have.=20 I think making this document a standard would be a mistake. =20 I think NOT publishing this document at all would be a BAD thing.=20 I support adoption and will review and continue to agrue against = standards track.=20 > tim >=20 Olafur >=20 > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:35 PM Olafur Gudmundsson > wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On May 11, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Tim Wicinski > wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> All, >>=20 >> As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to = run >> regular call for adoptions over next few months. =20 >> We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption. >>=20 >>=20 >> This starts a Call for Adoption for = draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones >>=20 >> The draft is available here: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/ = >>=20 >> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for = adoption >> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. >>=20 >> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, = etc. >>=20 >> This call for adoption ends: 25 May 2020 >>=20 >=20 > Tim,=20 > a nit question:=20 > what is the intended publication status ?=20 > Experimental, Informational, Standard =20 >=20 > Thanks=20 > Olafur >=20 >> Thanks, >> tim wicinski >> DNSOP co-chair >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop = >=20 --Apple-Mail=_6938147A-7A90-4826-99BF-EA33C408802D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

On May 12, 2020, at 9:43 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> = wrote:

Olafur

Currently it's marked = Standards Track, but I was working on the idea that the working group = would make 
that decision as the document works = toward Working Group Last Call.  

Tim 

Thanks for the clarification, 

I was reserving judgement until there = was implementations, interoperability, etc. 

Fair point 

Please feel free to register any = thoughts on publication status at this time as well.

Hope that helps


This = draft is a result of a failure by the DNS community to create any kind = of framework to manage distributed name server = clusters. 
The draft is a =E2=80=9Chack=E2=80=9D of the = best kind it is low impact but does the work for a sub-set of usage = cases that a real control plane should have. 

I think making this document a standard would be a = mistake.  
I think NOT publishing this document at all = would be a  BAD thing. 

I = support adoption and will review and continue to agrue against standards = track. 

tim


Olafur


On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 9:35 PM Olafur = Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:


On May = 11, 2020, at 1:41 PM, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:


All,

As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're = going to run
regular call for adoptions over next few = months.  
We are looking for *explicit* support for = adoption.


This starts a Call = for Adoption for draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-toorop-dnsop-dns-catalog= -zones/

Please review this draft to see = if you think it is suitable for adoption
by DNSOP, and = comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, = review, etc.

This call for adoption ends: = 25 May 2020


Tim, 
a nit = question: 
what is the intended publication = status ? 
Experimental, Informational, = Standard  

Thanks 
Olafur

Thanks,
tim wicinski
DNSOP co-chair



_______________________________________________
DNSOP = mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop


= --Apple-Mail=_6938147A-7A90-4826-99BF-EA33C408802D--