Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00.txt> (Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status) to Informational RFC

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 05 September 2019 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E564C120B63; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 15:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.435
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.435 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZV-Pz1bVbi3d; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 15:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD649120B7D; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 15:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (unknown [50.235.236.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 655D0892E8; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 22:02:12 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 22:02:11 +0000
Message-ID: <1748106.6pz4CBXWkp@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <m2imq68li3.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <156764055661.22821.274141071401649127.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9131d5a0-89a9-7972-89bc-0c5dbc52aaa1@brokendns.net> <m2imq68li3.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/24djkvE8uObdVP2h8VcFkLx--tA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-obsolete-dlv-00.txt> (Moving DNSSEC Lookaside Validation (DLV) to Historic Status) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 22:02:20 -0000

On Thursday, 5 September 2019 21:46:12 UTC Randy Bush wrote:
> ...
> 
> dlv had no particular trust model.  ...

as one of its janitors, its trust model was pub-sub. that's why it could never 
have scaled. wot is what's actually needed for this. follows-delegation is 
neither the best or worst way to do it, but at the moment, it's not slowing 
deployment.

-- 
Paul