Re: [DNSOP] [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

Dave Crocker <> Mon, 06 March 2017 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357B7128BA2 for <>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:11:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3GzDvhaDxA31 for <>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78935126D73 for <>; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:11:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v263DcCC018029 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:13:39 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1488770019; bh=DxCSq+uFJPA06AHODCBwlQBu8XYCocGEqITAizzDV/c=; h=Subject:To:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LU4K4NSKTZG2Sn2mXzmhlsPMnBfmVCVViTU8IgNCuAbPPIYfIJcfD9glH4ecRpP97 u3COQl7v2NuuQQVmV6b43yLyDsnB1JM5pVts2Kvy8vKsF+RkKACA/3Y7LPsJArxFP7 TIrU2do0MFSDGlpzNZ9fe1E34EE4898qtfjRbKfA=
To: John Levine <>,
References: <20170306023501.22939.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Dave Crocker <>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:11:27 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170306023501.22939.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [apps-discuss] Draft of interest in DNSOP: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 03:11:48 -0000

On 3/5/2017 6:35 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Again, my concern is with handing IANA an on-going task -- making a
>> check every time they update the Attrleaf table -- that requires their
>> being perfect at detecting collisions with one or more other tables.
> Has anyone asked IANA whether they have an opinion on how hard this
> would be?  For that matter, are there other registries with similar
> issues?  Do they have or would they plan to write software to do the
> cross check automatically when one of the registries is to be updated?
> I wouldn't think it'd be much different from checking whether a single
> registry has duplicate entries.

The advocate gets to pursue the questions.  Thank you for offering...


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking