IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating infrastructure .INT domains

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Fri, 12 November 2021 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF73E3A0A24 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 06:08:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.228
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9u7lvvgvBj27 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 06:08:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 478CC3A0A21 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 06:08:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 67296 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2021 14:05:33 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 12 Nov 2021 14:05:33 -0000
Message-ID: <49d7a00b-28d5-fbe5-3cd1-531aeb1f323c@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 23:08:01 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <9376d93c-becb-b7a8-1602-adbecccae99a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <357A4865-3BE1-453E-85A2-EF47BA0A0D25@hopcount.ca>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: <357A4865-3BE1-453E-85A2-EF47BA0A0D25@hopcount.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2FrGHH_KMXFKMsufgDGcgMrYwdY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating infrastructure .INT domains
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:08:13 -0000

Joe Abley wrote:

> The operational decisions relating to these things have already been
> made, as I understand it -- the delegations no longer exist. Kim and
> Amanda's document seems to have two purposes: (1) to document this
> operational reality, and (2) to update protocol specifications to
> reflect that operational reality.

I'm afraid (1) should be documented by a separate rfc maybe titled
as "Relationship between IETF and IANA", which should clarify
semantics of "IANA considerations" section of not only this but
also other rfcs, which was not a problem when both of the rfc
editor and IANA was the same person.

Is the "IANA considerations" section just a recommendation from
IETF/ISOC to IANA/ICANN or approved by IANA/ICANN during *modified*
standardization process of IETF?

					Masataka Ohta

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status