IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.

Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk> Sat, 23 January 2010 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@alex.org.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418A13A68DF for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:16:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lfgRjaJuW+HN for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.avalus.com (mail.avalus.com [89.16.176.221]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7055C3A683C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.100.15] (87-194-71-186.bethere.co.uk [87.194.71.186]) by mail.avalus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FD24C563AC; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:16:16 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:16:15 +0000
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
Message-ID: <6EA43DCC3C49948C424EA96D@Ximines.local>
In-Reply-To: <201001231725.o0NHP5sV053866@stora.ogud.com>
References: <200904282021.n3SKL3sg051528@givry.fdupont.fr> <59A58419-FDBD-4810-B2FA-0D293FFA00A5@NLnetLabs.nl> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1001211245180.12114@newtla.xelerance.com> <1AEAE091-2EB3-41DC-A51B-8DD49C10FAD5@NLnetLabs.nl> <24C8A8E2A81760E31D4CDE4A@Ximines.local> <alpine.LFD.1.10.1001221446090.24208@newtla.xelerance.com> <D6C3D7B5FE44C580F05A1673@nimrod.local> <a06240800c77fbd63ac6b@[10.31.200.180]> <13EEA44D7ADF3D8C09360D49@nimrod.local> <201001231725.o0NHP5sV053866@stora.ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] rfc4641bis: NSEC vs NSEC3.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:16:23 -0000

--On 23 January 2010 12:25:00 -0500 Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> 
wrote:

> Opt-out was designed for large delegation-only/mostly zones, in almost all
> other cases it should not be used.

And this was the only use case I was suggesting was excepted from
the blanket "should not" (in fact I went further and said it should
only apply to large delegation-only/mostly zones where secure
delegations were sparse).

-- 
Alex Bligh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email