Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not only home residental networks ...

"Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> Fri, 01 September 2017 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2264134523 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mathemainzel.info
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f8lDO9xsA1Lr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx01lb.world4you.com (mx01lb.world4you.com [81.19.149.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA7213441A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 13:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mathemainzel.info; s=dkim11; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=RG00fy5pVKuPTxHqD9+rcRswWbZoioVkfzb6sudcB5Y=; b=ZkRoVGl5boctbHHmXXlj5SnziFXeW4xuYKhmAMhjhuQQB6uyAZqFSlVWx92LO3AixNfy5NtBDmccTJ47vQCSDT28xjuUyp3+t8MMqQ71kwKxbMzCaP9O9JH8ta6bW+aObELkp5u5QIfAqiFAP+0KruFtE5KAcUdXV1t6SGsz6v0=;
Received: from [90.146.55.206] (helo=home.mail) by mx01lb.world4you.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>) id 1dnsBi-0001lA-8H; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:05:10 +0200
Message-ID: <59A9BD75.5010408@mathemainzel.info>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 22:05:09 +0200
From: "Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
Organization: Home
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (UNIX; U; Cray X-MP/48; en-US; rv:2.70) Gecko/20110929 Communicator/7.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
CC: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <150428805872.6417.9525310755360551475@ietfa.amsl.com> <59A9B760.2060209@mathemainzel.info> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709011556280.12556@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1709011556280.12556@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms090604030908010100020807"
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
X-AV-Do-Run: Yes
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.146.55.206
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Walter.H@mathemainzel.info
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx01lb.world4you.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/2K5t6fe7mxSsYOpc8Nhq0RYaMB0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not only home residental networks ...
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 20:05:13 -0000

On 01.09.2017 21:58, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Walter H. wrote:
>
>> but there still doesn't exist any for company networks, they most 
>> commonly use
>> the domain name 'local', which I already noticed, that this conflicts 
>> to RFC 6762 ...
>
> If you are a company and you are using a hardcoded domain of "local",
> then you have been and still are, completely broken. The only fix is to
> rename your network.
ACK and which non public domain name I can use for this
    that doesn't conflict now and will not conflict in the future?